Babylon as a city and nation is perhaps the most mentioned gentile city/state/nation in the Bible. Only those cities in Israel, such as Jerusalem receive greater mention. There are approximately 359 direct references to the name Babylon in the Old Testament. Of these references, many are simply tied to historical accounts of events in past history. However, the 2 major prophets of the Old Testament, Isaiah and Jeremiah received from God information about a future Babylon yet to come. This future Babylon is separate and distinct from the Babylon of their day.
The message of the prophets is that a latter-day Babylon would arise that would carry on the ‘spirit’ of the old Babylon. Hence, these two prophets present significant data concerning the identity of the future Babylon and its destiny. The prophets explain what will happen to this later Babylon along with data on who will be involved, where it will take place, when and how, along with why it takes place. These two prophets account for more than 80 direct references to this future city/state/nation. 64 of those are found in 2 chapters of Jeremiah. Those chapters are chapters 50 and 51. Isaiah accounts for 2 dozen more in chapters 13, 14, 18 and 47.
These chapters provide a substantial insight into what happens to this latter-day Babylon of the future. There are "identification markers" to identify this city/state/nation. For us today, it is hard to realize that 2,500 years ago society was organized differently. In those days, society developed around the notion of city/state/nations. A major city controlled a region around itself thereby making the city a capital for that region. If the city was powerful enough, it might also make other nearby cities subject to its power and control thereby creating pseudo-colonies or vassal states so to speak. It was rare for a major city to become so dominant that it controlled whole continents or large regions of continents. But the city was the dominant feature in the way society organized. It was the capital of an ‘empire’ and seldom did it contain cities of rival size or power. Today, things are different. Nations in general have several if not many cities, especially large countries.
In this chapter we will explore the significant details surrounding this latter-day Babylon. We will explore the data to help us discover its identity, who are the antagonists, the events themselves, the results, and also why God causes these events to occur.
Jeremiah and Isaiah both report many characteristics that help us to recognize who this new Babylon is, if indeed we are living in the latter days of the prophetic timetable. In this chapter we will refer to these identifying characteristics as identification markers…(I.D. markers) and I.D. data points. We will focus on determining what nation of today fits the descriptions given by Isaiah and Jeremiah. We will also show linkage to the Apostle John’s description of this same Babylon in two chapters of his Revelation…Chapters 17 & 18.
In addition to determining the identity, we will attempt to identify who is involved in causing the destruction of this future Babylon. We will also explore the events themselves, and the descriptions of those events. We will also examine the results and present to you the facts as to why God orders the destruction of this future Babylon. As you read on, I believe you will find the results to be shocking and sobering all at the same time.
The future-Babylon prophecies of Isaiah and Jeremiah have over the centuries been misunderstood and misapplied. Until recently, many comment- ators considered many of the prophecies to have already occurred. It does seem that some of the predicted results do apply to the ancient Babylon. Those results speak of Babylon becoming a desert, where desert animals live and no man resides there. In reality, ancient Babylon—the city, has been deserted for nearly a thousand years. It did NOT occur in the manner described in the future prophecies! Furthermore, the old national empire of Babylon has remained inhabited by man, yet the prophecies speak of no habitation for the nation/state as well as the city. Additionally, the events in question indicate that the demise of this Babylon will occur in … one…that’s 1…1 hour. Yes, that is 60 minutes of time…for complete annihilation of not just a city but also a city/state/nation. That never occurred for ancient Babylon. She just slowly dissolved into nothingness. Therefore, the prophecies of Isaiah and Jeremiah are indeed still for the future and we will explain in detail just why this is so.
In addition to the mistaken view that the prophecies of Isaiah and Jeremiah were fulfilled already against ancient Babylon, there are those that believe that ancient Babylon will be rebuilt and receive final destruction as described by the prophets. This has been a recent popular theory. For a while many conservative prophecy scholars agreed on this…as Iraq and Saddam Hussein seemed to grow into a military power in the days before Desert Storm. How ironic it is that perhaps ancient Babylon’s attempted resurgence was stopped by the future Babylon, during the war in 1991. There are many problems with those views about a rebuilt Babylon. The biggest stumbling block that is so obvious, is that in future Babylon, most of the world’s Jews will be residing there. At the close of this century, and with the dawn of a new millenium just around the corner, a rebuilt Iraq is not going to be a logical place for most of the world’s Jews to immigrate to on their own. The Jewish aspect invalidates this recent popular theory still held by some conservative scholars. There are many more elements that destroy the notion of a rebuilt Babylon, but as you will see by the end of this book, Iraq could not fit most of the requirements for being the future Babylon.
... ... ... ... ...
The Key Passages to be Examined with Brief Descriptions:
Jeremiah (Jer.) 50
verses 1-2: The announcement of destruction
verse 3: The details begin
verses 4-5: The timing for this future event in the prophetic timetable
verses 4-8: Regarding Jewish settlers in Babylon
verse 9: God’s announcement of judgment on Babylon
verses 9-10: More details
verse 11: Reasons for the judgment
verses 12-13: Results of the judgment
verses 14-16: Description of the destruction—the attack
verses 17-18: Prior Divine Judgments on Israel
verse 19: Israel restored to God’s favor
verse 20: Timing details again
verses 21-43: Babylon I.D. markers amid the descriptions
verses 44-46: Aftermath of Babylon’s demise
Jeremiah Chapter 51
verses 1-5: God’s announcement of judgment against Babylon
verse 6: Warning to Jews in Babylon to evacuate that city/nation
verse 7: Reason for God’s indictment and judgment on Babylon
verse 8: Mercy is suggested and divine healing?
verse 9: Babylon rejects mercy and healing!
verses 9-10: Judgment reaffirmed
verse 11: Divine summons to go to war against Babylon
verses 12-58: Details of the judgment
v. 45…key phrase spoken by God… "Come out her, My people."
see also Revelation chapter 18:4; also Isaiah 48:20, Jer. 51:6
along with Jer. 50:8 & 28
v. 49…Babylon is determined to be responsible for Israel’s casualties
v. 53…key phrase… "even though Babylon should ascend into the heavens"
verses 59-64: Conclusion
Isaiah Chapter 13: Oracle against Babylon
verses 1-2: Announcement & Timing of Event
verse 3: The Executioners of Divine Judgment: "My Righteous Ones"
verses 4-22: Details of the Judgment
verses 4 - 8… The battle
verses 9 - 16… Resulting effects
verses 17 - 22… More effects
Isaiah Chapter 14: Israel Reacts to Babylon’s Demise
verses 4-21…give the details of the results/and reactions
Isaiah Chapter 18: The Timing of the Destruction
verses 1, 2, 3, & 7: I.D. Markers about Babylon
Isaiah Chapter 47: Lament for Babylon
verses 1-15: I.D. markers about Babylon’s identity
Isaiah Chapter 48: God’s advisory to Israel
verses 14 – 22: Warning to Jews
verse 20: Specific warning to Jews to "flee" or evacuate.
End of Excerpt #1.
From Volume 2
Chapter 2
Is NOT the Roman
Catholic Church
or any other Church
One of the most popular theories regarding the identity of "Mystery Babylon" in Biblical Prophecy is the one that concludes that the Roman Catholic Church is the Harlot-Woman of Revelation 17. Some theorists claim that the Roman Catholic Church is the "Mystery Babylon of both Revelation 17 and 18. Now that latter view is full of obvious and blatant flaws. Revelation 18 makes it quite clear that it is a city/state/nation. This city then is an economic engine that powers the world's economy. These character traits in chapter 18 are so obvious that very few thoughtful, conservative, prophecy researchers take such a theory seriously. Revelation 18 makes it obvious that the entity called "Mystery Babylon" is indeed a city. The chapter 18 character traits of the city (called a "mega-city" in the Greek) reveal a city that can not be matched to the traits of Vatican City nor to Rome itself. For more information on the issue of Rome as Babylon see the next chapter in this book: Why Rome Can't Be Mystery Babylon.
In order to comprehend the entire issue of identifying "Mystery Babylon" one should understand some of the basic background regarding ancient Babylon. Some of this information will be found in the accompanying section 2 on "De-Mystifying Mystery Babylon." That section provides background depth concerning the ancient mystical religion of the Babylonian goddess ISHTAR. When we understand the proven and documented facts provided by archaeological discoveries of the Royal Records found in the cities of Babylonia/Chaldea we find that our prior understanding of the myths and legends of Babylonian religions (like that of Ishtar) are very inaccurate. Our prior misunderstanding of what Ishtar worship was all about has prevented us from correctly understanding what Revelation 17 is trying to tell us.
Too many researchers of the past, such as Alexander Hislop have been shown to be in error in their assumptions about ancient Babylon's religions. Hislop himself lived and died before any of the Royal Records were ever found. Furthermore, Hislop has been exposed by one of his staunchest modern-day supporters, Ralph Woodrow. Woodrow had written the definitive book supporting Hislop's research. It remained a bastion of support for Hislop's research until someone began showing Woodrow reasons to question Hislop's data. Woodrow then spent considerable time at the U.S. Library of Congress poring over old archives and researching the actual documents, and archaeological records. Woodrow found that Hislop's research was at best, sloppy and frequently made giant leaps of logic with no supporting data whatsoever. Hislop apparently also badly misquoted sources. Some have felt that Hislop committed intellectual "fraud" upon Christian theology. I don't know that I would go that far but Woodrow followed up with a book that now thoroughly exposes and refutes Hislop's work. Unfortunately, most of conservative Christianity has either rejected or neglected Woodrow's important expose of Hislop.
For those interested in the entire Hislop research (found in his book "The Two Babylons: A Tale of Two Cities") and the expose of it by Ralph Woodrow, you can order the book entitled:
"The Babylon Connection?"
ISBN: 0916938174
If you are interested in a little further background on the book you can go to the book's webpage at Amazon.com and find the author's comments and admissions about Hislop. To Woodrow's credit, he bought back all of the outstanding bookstore inventories of his old book that supported Hislop. This must have been a financial hardship, but Woodrow had the integrity to pursue such a course of action at his own expense.
Revelation 17 has been thought to be referring to the Church gone astray. This is an assumption that has prevailed historically in the church for many centuries. At the time of Christ, the "mystery religions" of Rome, Greece and Egypt were thought to be nationalized versions of Ishtar worship. We now have many documents from Babylon that date well back past the 2nd Millenium BC and may extend well back into the 3rd Millenium BC. These writings tell a different story regarding the original doctrines of Ishtar, the chief goddess of Babylon. These much older writings portray a goddess who is virtually identical to the woman of Revelation 17.
Ishtar, goddess of Babylon had many names and titles associated with her even at the very beginning. She was referred to as the "Mother of Temple Prostitutes" because it was her religion that introduced the whole concept of religious prostitution. She introduced the idea of "holy sex". It was a religious rite in which a person engaged in sexual relations for the purpose of purification, or the removal of sin! This is what Revelation 17: 5 is referring to when it says:
"And upon her forehead was a name written: MYSTERY BABYLON THE GREAT, MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH."
This verse repeats the title assigned to Ishtar nearly 3,000 years earlier. It is not saying that she was the literal mother of prostitutes. This title implies a role more like that of an overseer of an operation as in a house of ill repute. Now, Chapter 17 and verse 2 describes her relationship with the kings of the earth. It describes it in a manner of a sexual relationship. This occurred with the kings (or leaders) of the earth in a philosophical or spiritual manner.
Now, the actual ancient writings of Babylon speak of a special ritual that Ishtar engaged in once a year with the King. Zechariah Sitchin is a researcher of the ancient Babylonian writings and one of only a handful of people who can read and translate these cuneiform tablets. Sitchin has written several books presenting his decades of research into the translations. He describes in his book Divine Encounters (published by Avon Books, 1995) this ritual in which once a year the king was required to meet with Ishtar. She would come down from outer space in a crescent-shaped object. She was thought to come (like all the other Anunnaki 'gods') from the Pleiades star system, more specifically Sirius. She was also associated with the planet Venus. She would take refuge in a special honeymoon-like "chamber" called the "gigunu" (or chamber of nighttime pleasures).
It was the duty of the king to engage in sexual relations with her. Failure to perform would result in dire consequences. This activity occurred only at the New Year Festival. This "sacred" ceremony was called "The Sacred Marriage". It lasted all night. If the King emerged alive to the people he was allowed to remain in power for one more year. Sitchin documents this material in Divine Encounters on pages 161 through 182, but especially on this particular rite on pages 174-176.
Sitchin's research casts special insight into these very ancient doctrines. As one reads this recently published material from the archaeological finds one realizes that this material parallels precisely with what is described in the 17th chapter of Revelation. If one reads verse 4 and then reads the descriptions in the Royal records concerning what Ishtar looked like and how she dressed one realizes that we see this description matches that description found in verse 4. Ishtar would appear with either a golden cup in her outstretched hand or with a 'torch'. She would also be decked-out in jewels and gold along with royal robes of purple and scarlet. Many times she would wear a crown befitting her title as "Queen of Heaven."
We also know that Ishtar was called the goddess of personal freedom and liberty. She was also referred to as a warrior goddess as she would fight for freedom. She was also of course called the goddess of love. She was also called the "mother of immigrants" because she was thought to answer even the personal appeals of immigrants seeking freedom in Babylon. One of the traits that endeared her to the common peoples was that she was thought to be a personal goddess who heard and answered prayers of the average person. This trait also endeared her to the massive population of Babylon that consisted of immigrants to the nation. (This was a unique trait among the gods of Babylon). She was also a goddess who engaged in occult practices and promoted occult activities among the human population.
We also know from the recently found writings from ancient Babylon that Ishtar never actually "married". She also never actual gave physical birth to a child. So she was not a "mother" goddess to an infant son. Instead, she was a wanton woman who promoted not only heterosexual promiscuity but also homosexuality, as well as other perversions like incest and even bestiality and many other "sick" sexual perversions. She is credited for actually introducing the concept of homosexuality to the human race. Her motto was similar to the "If it feels good, do it" slogan of our 1960s baby boom generation. But that was nothing new, Ishtar introduced it to humanity perhaps as much as 4,00 to 5,000 years earlier.
Perhaps now you can recognize that all of these traits more closely match the description of Revelation 17. Those who felt that the Roman Catholic Church was the focus of this chapter based this view upon unbiblical and false doctrines. This being especially true regarding the doctrines and practices related to the Virgin Mary. These proponents felt that the Virgin Mary concept originated from Ishtar worship. They point to the research of Alexander Hislop and his book "The Two Babylons".
Hislop lived and wrote during the 1800s. His work predated the archaeological discoveries of ancient Babylon. He was unaware of the Royal Records of Babylon that have been discovered by modern archaeologists and translated by a handful of linguists. This new data proves that Hislop substantially erred in making certain assumptions. His oldest data sources were at least 1500 years after the facts recorded in those Royal Records of the libraries in ancient Babylonian cities. Therefore, Hislop's conclusions that the Roman Catholic Church was the "Mystery Babylon" of Revelation are erroneous.
The proponents of the theory that Mystery Babylon is the Roman Catholic Church will also claim that Revelation 17 is references not only the Virgin Mary as the Harlot, but also they point to Revelation 17:9. This verse, or so these theorists would claim proves that the city of Rome is being referred to. They then of course remind us that Rome is the location of the Vatican. In the next chapter we show that this verse 9 does not refer to Rome.
Revelation 17: 9 says: "And here is the mind, which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sitteth."
Now as we state in the next chapter, that word "mountain" which we see in the King James Version and the New American Standard Version refers to the original Greek word "hora". The most scholarly of Greek lexicons tell us that the word in its most basic form refers to a large landmass. It usually was used for mountains. But it could also refer to a desert. Now, remember deserts are flat. So you might ask what does this have to do with the idea that Rome is being referred to? The answer is that most other newer English translations use the word "hill". Why these new versions choose to use the word "hill" is something of a mystery to me. Strong's Concordance dictionary does mention it in passing because elsewhere the KJV sometimes uses "hill" in reference to that Greek word "hora".
What we do know is that there was a different word in the Greek language that was generally used for "hill". It was the word "bounos". This word was actually a word of Roman origination. The Romans used this word exclusively for the 7 hills of Rome. The Greeks simply had borrowed this word from the Romans. Thus in the first century AD, anyone who was writing in the Greek and referred to Rome's 7 hills would use the word "bounos". To use any other word, like "hora" would be inaccurate. The Greeks and Romans both used the word "bounos" exclusively in referring to the 7 hills of Rome. Therefore, the question arises "why would the Holy Spirit choose the word 'hora' instead of bounos if He were referring to Rome?" The obvious answer was that the Holy Spirit was NOT referring to Rome. He was referring to something completely different than the city of Rome. Thus, we find a major flaw exposed in the theory of not only Rome as Mystery Babylon, but also it is a flaw for those proponents contending that Mystery Babylon (whether of just chapter 17 or of 17/18) is the Roman Catholic Church.
Now the real problem with the theory that Revelation 17 is the Roman Catholic Church or any other church or organization is the word structure of Revelation 17:18. Here we find that the grammatical structure does not allow the woman to be separated from the city. How do we know this? Look at the verse structure.
"And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth."
Note the word "IS". That word "is" connotes an "=" sign. Therefore we could diagram the verse this way.
"The woman… = … the great city…" or the woman IS the great city. It doesn't say she is 'like' the great city. It simply says she IS the great city. This means that the woman is the outward "symbol" of the city. Now verse 18 then becomes the verse that links chapter 17 and 18 together. Why? Until now the woman is not linked to anything. Verse 18 does make the first link between her and the city. Chapter 18 then goes on to describe her as a city/state/nation. Repeatedly we see character traits that describe more than just a city. Rather we see it described as a nation. It is a nation that has a woman as its national symbol. The woman is actually Ishtar, goddess of Babylon, known as the goddess of personal freedom. She is the goddess of immigrants. This is what Revelation 17: 1 and 15 is referring to as we see the woman connected to the many ethnic groups of immigrants. Note that this symbolism of water also links to the concept of immigrants. Can you think of anything in the world today, which has the symbol of a woman connected to immigrants and immigration and is also closely connected to water? I can. Can you think of any symbol? Did the Statue of Liberty come to your mind?
All of this is further underscored by recognizing that there are at least 21 character traits of this Mystery Babylon that do NOT match up to the concept of Mystery Babylon being the Vatican or the Roman Catholic Church. Here's a list of those 21 traits. (These same traits and more are provided in the next chapter and are extensively discussed including all of the scripture passages. In the interest of brevity we have simply chosen to show the simplicity of these traits without all of the accompanying sources to allow the reader to obtain the full impact without the distractions of the locations.
Rest assured the locations and much more are discussed in the next Chapter that more clearly focuses just on the Rome = Babylon theory. And now your simple list of traits that the Vatican/RCC cannot match up to:
#1. The Jewish Population Issue
#2. The chief city of Mystery Babylon is a "DEEP WATER PORT CITY"!!!
#3. It is the KEY Commercial Nation and Engine of Wealth for the World’s Economy.
#4. Leading center of imports and consumption.
#5. She is also a manufacturing nation
#6. Center for Merchandising and Marketing
#7. Known as the World’s "policeman"
#8. Known for "showing the flag" or "gunboat diplomacy"
#9. Sensual, Materialistic lifestyle
#10. Intoxicating high-society lifestyle as a world example to emulate
#11. Elegant, Sumptuous lifestyle
#12. Noted for its bright gaudy-colored lights and nightlife with round the-clock partying.
#13. Noted for its Drugs and Drug use
#14. A land of immigrants
#15. Land of Rebels in its birth
#16. Land of Agriculture (when was the last time you saw wheat combines and corn-pickers harvesting crops in Vatican City? How about Hog farming? A cattle ranch?
#17. Described as a "Land" of many waters. "Land" is a term designating a nation not a city and not an organization or church.
#18. Where the world’s leaders "stream" to meet (Jer 51:44 -- where they all come at once to get together on a regular basis... also Rev. 17:18)
#19. Last of the Super powers
#20. Defenses reach up to Outer Space
#21. AND LAST BUT BY NO MEANS THE LEAST… THE MOST LITERAL OF ALL: --A populated city named Babylon with deepwater port facilities and the city is considered the "chief city" or most important city of the nation. This is how people of the first century AD referred to a nation, by its chief city.
Finally, we've not really included it but you notice the references to "Defenses that 'mount up' into the heavens (or space). Plus the notes about Her Navy performing "showing the flag" exercises. Then of course there are the references to her armies and soldiers. The Vatican has no standing Armies. Yet just another of the many aspects that rule out the theory that the Roman Catholic Church is "Mystery Babylon."
In the next section we present much more evidence showing the background and heritage of the Statue of Liberty. We present the ironclad proof that the sculptor of this statue designed her to be his rendering of the goddess Ishtar, known as the goddess of freedom and liberty. We will assert that Revelation 17: 9 is speaking specifically of the Statue and her crown of 7 spikes. Those 7 spikes flash the occult enlightenment of the sun god Utu upon each of the 7 "hora"… or large landmasses… which is what the root word of "hora" actually means and not mountains. You will want to read that chapter carefully because the behind-the-scenes facts of the Statue of Liberty will just amaze you and leave you shaking your head. After all, the sculptor was a Freemason and he was very much caught up in the masonic world incorporated from the "mystery" religious doctrines of Ishtar.
End of Excerpt #2
From Volume 2
Chapter 3
Can’t Be
"Mystery Babylon"
The most popular and prevalent theory floating in conservative Christian theological circles today regarding the identity of "Mystery Babylon" is the view that Rome must be "Mystery Babylon." This notion has a long and rich history that dates back to the early church era, just after John wrote the Revelation. The reasoning in the early church was quite simple. Rome had seemed as though it would always be the World Empire. Rome had reigned as the World Empire effectively for nearly 300 years and showed no signs of losing its grip. Therefore, it seemed only logical to conclude that the descriptions of this "Mystery Babylon" must indeed be referring to Rome. After all, many times Rome was referred to as "Babylon"…because it had incorporated so much of Babylonian religion and thought into its culture. This view continued to exist until the collapse of the Roman Empire and the rise of the Catholic Church.
The view that Rome was Babylon died out after Christianity became the dominant power in world affairs. It saw a rebirth during the Reformation, when some Protestant theologians thought the Catholic Church was the Harlot of Revelation chapter 17. Some saw the city of chapter 18 as either the church or a rebuilt Roman Empire. This view rose to greater promise with each successive attempt to restore the old Roman Empire by the likes of Napoleon and other European leaders.
American Protestants (from the 1800s up to the present time) felt that the evil Roman Catholic Church in particular must be the Harlot of chapter 17. The debate over whether Revelation 18 was the Roman City itself or a rebuilt empire remained a hot issue for nearly two centuries. The research by Dr. Hislop and his book, "The Two Babylons" only served to underscore the theory that Rome and the Catholic Church were the focus of Revelation 17 & 18. In the 1970s the debate was shifted by some conservative Protestant scholars more towards the notion that it was simply Rome that was "Mystery Babylon"…but most would not rule out the Catholic Church as the entity being described in Revelation 18.
During much of this time, the notion that the Old Testament prophecies of a future Babylon were pretty much dismissed as having already been fulfilled because the ancient site of Babylon was unknown. Some liberal scholars claimed Babylon was just a myth and a legend. By the end of the 19th century archaeologists had discovered the ruins of ancient Babylon. Most scholars though still thought the prophecies of Isaiah 13, 14, 18, 21, 47, 48, and also Jeremiah 50, 51 had already been fulfilled. Yet a careful analysis shows that those prophecies still remain unfulfilled to this day. Meanwhile, Hislop’s research pointed to the Catholic Church as the Harlot of chapter 17 and either the Vatican City or Rome as the "mega-city" of Rev. ch. 18. This remained as the predominant of all conservative Christian views.
The reasons for these views rest on 3 key misconceptions. They are:
#1. The goddess of Babylon, Ishtar is thought to be the Mother-goddess with an
infant that posed striking similarities with the Virgin Mary concept of Catholicism. Hislop spends a great deal of time on this matter in an effort to show that there indeed was/is a connection between the two concepts and therefore linked the Roman Catholic Church as "the Harlot" of Revelation 17. Thus, in this view some would say that "Mystery Babylon" is Rome because it is the seat of the Catholic Church.
#2. Revelation 17:9 is a reference to the 7 hills of Rome. Therefore, chapter 17 and also Chapter 18 refers to Rome as Babylon.
#3. Revelation 17:18 refers to the "present tense" and therefore is a reference to the Rome of the first century AD, not to some future time when the actions are in present tense in some future point of time. Also the verse is ignored in its grammatical aspects regarding present and future tense time frames in order to make this theoretical point valid.
Those are the three misconceptions that the proponents of the Rome = Babylon theory do not realize. Why do we say that these ideas are misconceptions? Let's look at each of the three points in detail.
Misconception #1: Babylon's goddess Ishtar = the Virgin Mary concept. Noted researchers like John Heise have posted some of their Sumerian (Babylonian) archaeological research data on the Internet. For our purposes relating to Ishtar the reader may want to visit this link at John's website:
http://www.sron.ruu.nl/~jheise/akkadian/mesopotamia.html
Also go to his Main index page to realize the extent of this man's research and qualifications as a Sumerologist (a scholarly researcher specializing in archaeology and language of Sumer or Babylonia, the land of Babylon). Here's the link:
http://www.sron.ruu.nl/~jheise/akkadian/index.html
As you will see this man is one of the few people in the world who can read the cuneiform tablets of Sumer/Babylonia. His website gives a primer to readers for learning how to read the cuneiform tablets. Only a handful of men are considered to really be able to read and understand for translation the writing on those ancient clay tablets called cuneiform tablets. This man is one among the handful.
What the theorists don't realize is that Alexander Hislop lived before the time when the key Babylonian tablets were found and translated.
Hislop had no knowledge of what was to be later found by archaeological discoveries, namely the Royal Library Records of ancient Babylon, including the governmental archives and writings pertaining to the religions of Babylon. In fact, after these discoveries most of the tablets went untranslated because no one knew the language. Only a few scholars have been able to learn it sufficiently to translate those tablets. Therefore, Hislop himself in his book refers to the fact that his entire thesis might be incorrect because his source data of information about the Babylonian religion did not go back to Babylon, but rather the succeeding empires that came later.
Hislop's sources are only as old as about the middle of the first millenium BC. So Hislop had no first-hand source material for his assertions. His primary sources were mostly historians living no earlier than 400 BC. Most of his earliest material is extremely fragmentary so thus he relied upon later Greek and Roman historians as well as Church historians from the 3rd thru the 5th Centuries AD.
The cuneiform tablets of the Royal Libraries of Babylonia tell us much more about Ishtar, especially those documents from her Temple. These tablets give us a much more reliable picture than what Hislop presents. These ancient cuneiform tablets are direct first-hand sources from Babylon. They tell us that Ishtar was the chief goddess of Babylon. Among the details, we find that Ishtar never gave physical birth to a child. She was however considered a Mother of her Temple Prostitutes. It was one of her titles…"Mother of Prostitutes". She promoted the whole idea of sexual freedom because she was known as the goddess of personal freedom and liberty…including sexual freedom. This certainly matches the Revelation 17:5 passage that actually calls Ishtar by her idiomatic name…"mother of Harlots" which was a slur in the Biblical sense but a phrase of honor in Babylon.
The entire character of Ishtar and her doctrines is far different from that portrayed by Hislop. He had confused Ishtar with the 'myth of Semiramis'. Semiramis, according to Hislop and the Greek historians of the late 1st millenium BC was the wife of Nimrod. However, we find no records of Nimrod's wife anywhere in the Royal Libraries. We also do not find the name Semiramis in any of the Royal Records. Semiramis was no doubt a fictional creation. She was a genuine 'myth' that grew up more than 3,000 years after the Tower of Babel. Hislop had contended that Ishtar was Semiramis, therefore this linked the ancient goddess to the same doctrines practiced by the Greek's and the Romans as having come unaltered from Ishtar. The closest possibility is an Assyrian (not Babylonian) queen named Sammu-ramat who lived around 800 BC or about 1,500 to 2,000 years after Nimrod. Now that is quite an age difference!
We find however that clay tablets tell a different story and thus Hislop's work is in complete error. He wrote in his book that this might be so because he didn't have the source documentation to back up what he admitted was a theory. A theory that seemed valid at the time he wrote the book. Thus, the Rome = Babylon theorists hang their hats (in part) upon the errant theories of Hislop. Theories that have now been proven to be false by the actual source documents from Babylon, and not by word of mouth some 3,000 years later.
So the notion that the woman of Rev 17 is Ishtar, the Virgin Mary …and symbol of the Catholic Church has a serious and fatal flaw. Yes, the woman or harlot is Ishtar, but it's not the Virgin Mary. Neither are the original mystical doctrines of Ishtar anything quite like the doctrines that were practiced 3,000 years later upon which these theorists now wish to rest their case for Rome = Babylon.
Misconception #2. That Revelation 17:9 is a reference to Rome as being the city called Babylon. The basis for that claim is made primarily on the basis that some translations use the English word "hill" in verse 9. However, the KJV does not use the term "hill". Neither does the New American Standard Bible. Both of those versions use the term "mountain". Most other modern translations use the term "hill." Why is this important to the notion that Rome is Babylon? Look at the Verse: 9
"And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sitteth."
The Rome = Babylon theorists will point to the verse and claim this verse is referring to the 7 'hills' of Rome. They overlook the 2 more reliable of all English versions which say "mountains". The typical R=B theorist will not be dissuaded by such a minor technicality…by claiming that whether it is "mountains" or "hills" its still the same thing. Still, others will look at the Greek text to see what the actual Greek word is and what it means.
The Greek word used here is the word "hora". (not "ora" as some have alluded). There is a rough breathing mark before the letters o-r-a. That rough breathing mark means that an 'h' sound must be pronounced first, thus the word is pronounced "hora". Now, for those who are familiar with Strong's concordance numbering system the number is = #3735. Dr. Strong himself ascribed the meaning as being 'mountain' in primary usage. He does cite a minority opinion that sometimes it might be used in referring to a hill. That is a debatable issue.
Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon does not even mention hill as a possible definition. Perhaps that is because of Luke 3:5 where we find the word "hora" is translated as "mountain". The word in that verse for "hill" is the word "bounos". Now that is significant because we see that "hill" is connected to a word other than "hora" for which the non-Greek researcher would not realize the difference. Regarding the meaning of "hora"… to fully comprehend this word we should turn to the esteemed work of Moulton & Milligan's Vocabulary of the Greek Testament.
Moulton & Milligan's work is unlike most lexicons because it is providing definitions based upon a rendering of all koine writings that have been found by archaelogists in odd places like "trash dumps" among other places. Using all sorts of written documents even if partially or mostly destroyed, many times a linguist and translator can get a feel for the true meaning of how a word was used and not simply what the dictionary definitions state. Thus, it is interesting that Moulton & Milligan cite that the word 'hora' was often used for the desert. Yes, that's right … a desert. Now deserts tend to be flat, not hilly nor mountainous. They go on to indicate that the typical normal usage of the word was "mountain" but not hill. Hmmm. Why would that be? There is a different word for "hill" in the Greek. It is the word we mentioned earlier that is also found in Luke 3:5 as it sits almost side by side with the word "hora". Now this word for hill that we see in Luke 3:5 is the word "bounos".
"Bounos" is the key to Revelation 17:9 because "bounos" is NOT…. I repeat bounos IS NOT USED nor found in Revelation 17:9. It is the word for hill. BUT…BUT…BUT…BUT…. (Do I have your attention, now?) Please note this next statement. The word "bounos" was actually a word the Greeks borrowed from the Romans who used the word exclusively to refer to the 7 hills of Rome. That's right. The word "bounos" is the grammatically correct word to use if you were to refer to the 7 hills of Rome.
Now, Revelation 17:9 does not have the word "bounos" in the text. It is the word "hora". So that, IF the Holy Spirit, who guided John's hand and mind in writing the Revelation, were referring in verse 9 (and really all of chapters 17 and 18)… then why did the Holy Spirit make an ERROR in the Greek Language???? I DID NOT REALIZE THAT GOD COULD SIN !!!!!! I DID NOT REALIZE THAT GOD COULD MAKE AN ERROR…even if it was in language? Why did God, the Holy Spirit make the Greek Grammatical error of using "hora" to describe the 7 Hills of Rome when HE should have used the word "bounos"??????? The answer is, of course, that He didn’t make an error because He was not referring to nor speaking of Rome. He was speaking of a nation and its chief city and IF it were Rome, the Lord would have used the correct word for the 7 hills of Rome…the word "Bounos"… which is actually a Roman word the Greek's borrowed from the Romans. See Moulton & Milligan's research on this word in "Vocabulary of the Greek Testament".
Now, all languages borrow words from other languages. We borrow a lot of words from the French and Spanish languages. We have even borrowed from the Japanese (like sayonara). If we were at a bullfight in Mexico would we use the term 'ole or "hurray" when cheering? Yes. IF, I were to say to you that I visited the Italian city of Pisa and saw the leaning skyscraper, would I be accurate? No, because the Leaning Tower of Pisa is actually the bell tower for a cathedral not a skyscraper. If I were to have referred to it as an office building would I have been correct? No. So too, with the usage of the word "hora" to describe the 7 hills of Rome. I would only be correct if I used the term "bounos."
Herein lies the death knell for any "Rome = Babylon" theorist that wants to use Revelation 17:9 as a proof text for his theory. He must explain this incorrect usage by the Lord in order to use this verse properly as a proof for his theory of Rome. It cannot be adequately explained. This author knows because this author started out to use that verse to prove that Rome was Babylon. I couldn't do it honestly or fairly. I had to abandon it as a proof as painful as that was. It was only one of the many, painful, abandonments that I endured as I spent several years of research trying to prove the "Rome = Babylon" theory was indeed correct.
It took me 3 years to begin to surrender from that position, by virtue of the overwhelming evidence that piled up against that view. So too with all the other theories except for the America = Babylon theory.
The America = Babylon theory is the only one I can't shoot down. In fact, I couldn't shoot down one single character trait of all the dozens that are found in the scriptures that help us to identify "Mystery Babylon". It took me 4 years to accept that I'd been wrong about Rome or the Catholic Church or Iraq or anyone else as Mystery Babylon. The last thing I wanted to do was to believe that America was the Babylon of future Prophecy. When I realized that I couldn't use the Revelation 17:9 passage as proof the whole theory just seemed to crumble. Then the discovery that Hislop's assumptions and data conclusions were in complete error only underscored the problem. But those were only 2 of the three key linchpins that held the Rome as Babylon theory together.
Misconception #3. Revelation 17:18 is the key passage for this misconception.
"And the woman which thou sawest is that great city which reigneth over the kings of the earth."
This verse is used to claim that it must be referring to Rome because of, (in part
Verse 9 -- and the false notion/assumption that "hora" means the 7 hills of Rome)
the verb "is" happens to be in a "present" tense. Therefore it must be referring to a city in existence at the time John wrote his visions down. Now, there is a problem with that notion because, the whole book is future!!! It has not occurred yet. So, the question becomes whether or not the verb "is" ("estin" is the Greek word) refers to a "present" tense of 90 AD or "present" tense at the time John saw it. You should note that he saw it in the future? So, which is correct?
The most respected of the Greek Lexicons of the New Testament is called the "Bauer-Arndt, Gingrich and Danker Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian Literature" It is heavily cited by the most scholarly conservative Christian exegetes of the Greek New Testament. It is well respected. (It is referred to in abbreviations as BAGD or B-A-G-D). BAGD cites the usage of "estin" in cases like Revelation 17:18. [This subject is covered extensively in the book: "America, The Babylon" Vol. 1 on pages 231-234 where BAGD is cited. It shows conclusively that the word "estin" is referring to a present tense at a future point in time to the writing not referring to a present tense at the time of the writing because contextually the context is future.] The other references to Babylon in both chapters 17 and 18 are future tense. The context of verse 18 is that the word "estin" functions as an equal's sign. Thus if we were to present it like a mathematical equation it would look like:
"And the woman = the mega-city"
Or
the woman = the city
Or
the woman IS the city
This is the heart of the context of the verse. The overall context is a present tense at that time in the future. Thus, we lose the ability to claim that this verse is referring to 90 AD and thus Rome. Once we've realized that the grammatical rules won't support a 90 AD time frame without a violation of the rules of grammar we then move out of a state of confusion. We come to a realization that the verse is focusing on the notion that the woman IS the city … not that: "the woman is the mega-city which reigns over the kings of the earth." The last clause is secondary to the main issue of the verse. The main issue is … woman = city.
Now, let us look at all of the key character traits found in the various applied prophecies of this future Babylon. The following is a list of those traits that describe and therefore help us to understand and recognize this future Babylon that do NOT fit the theory of Rome as being this future Babylon.
#1. The Jewish Population Issue Jeremiah 50:8, 25; Jeremiah 51: 6, 45; Isaiah 48:20 and also Revelation 18:4 … are all references to Jewish people living in this future mystery Babylon. In the ancient Babylon, from the 6th Century BC till well into the early Church Age, the majority of the Jewish population lived in ancient Babylon. It was the home to most of the world’s Jews even in the time of Christ. Today, the largest population of Jewish people is found in the United States. The next two nations … Israel (home to the 2nd largest Jewish population) and Russia (home to the 3rd largest Jewish population) combined do not equal the population of Jewish people living in America. Rome on the other hand has some Jews living in its borders but not enough, nor prominent enough to match the criteria. Therefore, this trait alone disqualifies the theory of Rome = Mystery Babylon.
#2. The chief city of Mystery Babylon is a "DEEP WATER PORT CITY"!!! Revelation 18: 17-19. This passage tells us that merchant ships are standing off the shoreline of Babylon. These ships have either just unloaded in the port city of Mystery Babylon, or are waiting to dock when the fiery judgment hits. These ship captains, crew and passengers are witnesses to the destruction. Question? Why would these folks be standing on deck of merchant ships unless there were Port facilities in this city? Answer. The city is a port city. In this day and age, especially by virtue of the list of commodities that are traded in "mystery Babylon"… see Revelation 18:11-13… one thing can be noted… this city, to have this kind of merchandise coming in by ships…must be a DEEP WATER SEAPORT CITY. Why? For ships of today to bring such merchandise requires the ships to be large commercial freighters. These ships require deep-water port facilities to dock and unload/load. They must have a harbor with large depths.
Now here is the problem for the "Rome = Babylon" theorists. Rome is NOT a deepwater seaport, period!!! Ancient Rome, we are told must be the only literal interpretation. However, Ancient Rome was not a Seaport either. Rome is landlocked.
#3. It is the KEY Commercial Nation and Engine of Wealth for the World’s Economy. Isaiah 47:15. Revelation 17:2; Revelation 18: 3, 9, 11-13, 15, 16, 17-19, 22, 23, & 19:2. Here in these passages we see just what relationship Babylon enjoys with the rest of the world. Here she is clearly the critical factor in the world economy. When she goes down in flames…what is the lament?? "What was like unto this mega city?" "Who will buy our goods now that she is gone"?? The answer is that no one will be able to buy the products of the world’s merchants. What does this tell us??? It should be a clear warning indicator that whoever this nation is… the rest of the world depends on her for buying their merchandise. With her destruction, there is no one left to buy their goods. That tells us just how vital this nation is. That means that this nation is the engine of wealth for the world.
Now, Rome (nor Italy) does NOT and can not fit that role…at least not in the next 30 years, unless the rest of the world is wiped out first. Rome and Italy have nearly gone broke several times. They have the shakiest economy in all of Europe, save for other communist bloc nations. Once again, we see a character trait that Rome does not exemplify in anyway, shape nor form.
#4-#21… These are 18 commodities in a list that are the chief trading products as cited in Rev 18:11-13 for which the merchants and sailors later lament that no one will buy their products anymore! Rev 18:12-13 provides a list of Gold, Silver and Copper. Now on these items alone… there is more Gold traded in New York City on the COMEX in one day than in all the rest of the world, combined !!! The same is true for Silver and Copper also. It is true for Crude Oil. In fact, the volumes of trade are so heavy that in one day alone, there is more gold traded in one day than had been traded in all of human history up until 1974 when Gold trading was allowed to be done on a futures contractual basis. That is how massive and how dominant the USA and NYC are in the commodities trading markets. Revelation 18: 12 & 13, lists many other commodities as well… including grains and livestock.
Now, Chicago is the host city for such record trading in that arena. (It too is a port city on Lake Michigan). The fact of the matter is this… Rome/Italy has one of the shakiest economies in Europe… It has no ability to be the economic engine of wealth for the whole world. If Rome vanished from the face of the earth today…it would not even cause a ripple in the World’s economy. However, if the USA vanished today… it would decimate the world’s economy and bankrupt every nation on earth, instantly. In essence, there would be no one left to buy the foreigner’s goods. That’s because no one else wants to import goods…they only want to export. The USA was the big promoter of international trade and promoted imports. Iraq plays no such role in the world economy. She is too poor to do so.
#22. Leading center of imports and consumption. Revelation 18: 11, 17-19. These passages tell us the economic picture of this nation. Note that this nation is not only involved in the trade of these products, but that she is also the leading importer… because when she is destroyed…"no one buys"… their merchandise anymore. The folks lamenting are the international merchants who export goods to this mystery Babylon. Therefore, she is the leading import nation. She also then is by virtue of her importer status… the chief consuming nation. This also is not a description of Rome or Italy. Rome/Italy has no such status in the world today or for tomorrow or the foreseeable future! It is this aspect which negates the Rome = Babylon theory…because the contention is that we are living in the "last days" and the fulfillment of the end-times prophecies are at hand. IF this is true, and I assert that it indeed is true…then how can Rome, Italy or even Iraq match these character traits in so short a span of time??? Answer: she can’t. She is not the nation being described. There is one nation that does fit all of these traits, and then many more traits that are also listed. That nation is the United States of America.
#23. She is also a manufacturing nation. Revelation 18: 22. This passage tells us about her manufacturing no longer being found in her after the judgment. This tells us she was a manufacturing nation before the judgment. Rome/Italy is not a nation noted for being a world leader in manufacturing. How many folks do you know drive an Italian car here in the United States? There aren't that many Europeans driving Italian cars either as a relative percentage.
#24. Center for Merchandising and Marketing. Revelation 18: 3, 23; 19:2. Her merchants were the mega-merchants of the earth. This again does not fit the character traits of Rome or Italy. It does fit the picture of America.
#25. Known as the World’s "policeman". Jeremiah 50:23 gives us a Hebrew idiom, "hammer of the whole earth". It had been used at one time to describe the way the empires of Persia, Greece and Rome had applied their power to keep the world at peace. Today, after the decline and fall of the Iron Curtain, major news media referred to America as the world’s policeman, in the same kind of role that the Hebrew idiom references. Rome or Italy does not fit this role.
#26. Known for "showing the flag" or "gunboat diplomacy". Isaiah 18:1-2 Here again, 2 Hebrew idioms for the idea of a nation’s navy showing its power. The phrase in verse 1 relates to the idea of "air travel". The first phrase of verse 2…"that sends ambassadors by the sea" another Hebrew idiom for when ancient naval powers would send warships to "show the flag" of friendship or threaten war to unfriendly nations or cities. Today, one nation engages in such actions. The USA does send out naval units usually as aircraft carrier battle groups. The notion of verse 1 with air travel combined with verse 2 and the naval aspect, thus combines to send a notion of naval and air power … or suggesting aircraft carriers!!! Rome has no military of any kind. Italy has very limited military power. Her naval power is especially limited to Home waters.
#27. Noted for its elegant luxurious lifestyles, refined, rich lifestyles. Isaiah 47: 1-8; Revelation 17: 4-5; 18: 2 –24, This does not match up with Rome. Rome is not capable of reaching such levels of wealthy living standards in our lifetime. It's always fighting perpetual rounds of inflation bordering at times near hyperinflation levels.
#28. Extremely Wealthy Jeremiah 51:13 Revelation 18: 2-19. Rome isn't that wealthy.
#29. Sensual, Materialistic lifestyle. Isaiah 47: 8; Revelation 18:14. Now this one might be open to debate.
#30. The Highest Living Standards Isaiah 47:1 Revelation 18: 14. Italy does not enjoy any standard near the levels of the US or most other nations of Europe.
#31. Intoxicating high-society lifestyle as a world example to emulate
Revelation 17:2; Revelation 18: 3, 14, 23. Again, this might be debatable.
#32. Elegant, Sumptuous lifestyle. Revelation 18: 14, 23. Again debatable as to whether Rome and Italy might be said to have this feature. But not really on the basis of the average citizen.
#33. Noted for its bright gaudy-colored lights and nightlife with round the-clock partying. Revelation 18:14. Note the words "dainty" and "goodly". Dainty is a word in Greek that connotes to 24-hour parties and is connoted with orgies and debauchery. The word for "goodly" is the Greek word "lampra" from which we get the English word for lamp. In this case it carries the idea of bright, gaudy-colored lights, with idea of "glitzy" lights. The bright lights of Broadway or Times Square?? Or perhaps even Las Vegas?? While Rome might have some lights, its not reached the levels of New York City or Las Vegas, etc.
#34. Noted for its Drugs and Drug use. Isaiah 47: 9, 12. Revelation 18:23 Do we even need to comment on this one???? I think not… the text clearly speaks for itself on this one. This should be a "no-brainer". Even the Italian Mafia is no longer the big kingpin in the drug world. That belongs to other cultures now.
#35. Noted for its culture. Revelation 18:14, 22 Okay, some might want to debate that…but you don't see a lot of Italian movies winning Oscars, or its music dominating radio stations around the world, or its TV programs in syndication around the world. It's not world leader in developing new art. Yes, it does dominate the world of opera, but the world does not pay much attention to opera.
#36. Noted for being Wasteful, Extravagant. Rev 18: 3, 7, 9, 14, 15;
implied in Rev 17: 2. Here again, we've got another "no-brainer." Texas alone matches most nations and that would probably include Italy and Rome.
#37. Massive Population. Rev. 18:15. And Revelation 17: 1, 15. Again another "no-brainer." The text doesn't claim that Babylon has the most. It simply notes that she is 'big'… or mega in size including population.
#38. A land of immigrants Jeremiah 50:16; 51:13; Rev. 17:1, 15. Well, with the Statue of Liberty as a symbol… there is no nation that has more appeal for immigration. Not many line up to want to immigrate to Italy.
#39. Unique and awe-inspiring beginning in its birth & right up to its demise. Isaiah 18: 2 While many nations have an interesting beginning, none have the kind of beginning that America had.
#40. Remarkably different heritage. Isaiah 18:2 See #39 above.
#41. Respected-envied and yet HATED by the whole world also. Isa. 18:2 No nation has this status within the family of nations other than the USA. "Yankee go home"… does that ring a bell? Yet, remember most of the world envies and respects the USA.
#43. Powerful and Oppressive Isaiah 18:2 Do we need to talk about all the military adventures the US has engaged in since the end of World War 2? When
did you last hear of Italy or Rome bombing anybody? When was the last time you heard about the Italian Pacific fleet in maneuvers at the same time its Atlantic fleet was conducting exercises? When was the last time Italy engaged in naval exercises or 'gun boat diplomacy'?
#44. Land of Rebels in its birth Jeremiah 51: 1; Isaiah 47: 9.
#45. Cosmopolitan and Urban Jeremiah 50:32
#46. Land of Agriculture. Jeremiah 50: 16 Okay… when was the last time you saw farms in Rome itself? I'd like to know how much wheat, oats, corn, rice, etc that is grown in the city of Rome? I can just see a Wheat combine harvesting all around the Vatican. Uh huh, sure!
#47. An International City. Revelation 17: 18; 18:15. Well there are several cities that could fit that category.
#48. Architecture, buildings and skyline. Isaiah 13:22 Now the Rome theorists might want to argue for Rome's skyline and architecture… so I'll be generous and allow a "tie" on this one…giving it a maybe or maybe not.
#49. Land of Many waters. (fresh waters) Jeremiah 51:13, 36, 42; Isa 18:1,2
Definitely not Rome. This is another city and nation where you don't drink the water… that's why they drink wine so much. The fresh water is poor and limited.
#50. Where the world’s leaders "stream" to meet. Jer. 51:44; Rev. 17:18. Rome is NOT where all the world's leaders meet regularly. The only place that happens is at the UN in New York City, at least once every year. Not Rome, nor anywhere else.
#51. Last of the Super powers. Jeremiah 50:12; Rev 17:18; and in the Revelation 18:18 passage "what city is like the ‘mega’ city"…also verse 19…Rome is definitely NOT a super power. No nation has ever had the power militarily and economically that the USA has had, especially in a percentage relationship to the rest of the world. Only ancient Babylon comes close, (before humanity had spread out) but ancient Babylon, to the best of our knowledge never sent spacecraft or men to the moon.
#52. No Fear of Invasion. Isaiah 47:5, 8; Revelation 18: 7-- Italy is concerned about Libya and Moammar Khaddafy although not as much as 10-12 years ago.
53. Defenses reach up to Outer Space--Jeremiah 51:53. Since when did Italy or Rome ever have an astronaut program? Or a space program for that matter.
#54. Occult aspects Isaiah 47: 9, 12,13.
#55. Alliances/Treaties allowing physical military bases of operation for
the Satanic forces. Revelation 18: 2.
#56. Its national symbol… Robed woman with a cup-like container in one hand that smells like natural gas odors inside the container…and the woman is connected to water and immigration…and is considered to be a mother-figure to spiritual prostitution…a.k.a. Ishtar, the mother of ‘literal’ and ‘physical’ prostitutes within religious worship centers. That is what the Babylonian goddess Ishtar was, the promoter of physical prostitution… salvation by sex… have sex with a temple priest or priestess and you are purified from sin. And of course you pay a ‘gift offering’ for this salvation activity. Ishtar was never a physical ‘mother’… but rather a ‘madam’ over the priestesses. Ishtar was never married and never had a child…but she was called "mother" of the temple priestesses. Kind of like a "house mother."
Now having said all of this… I’m referring to the Statue of Liberty. In my book, "America, The Babylon" I explain the meticulous research involved that shows that the Statue of Liberty is in fact the brain-child of the sculptor Bartholdi’s idea to create an image of the goddess Liberty of Rome. I then show how the Roman goddess was in fact borrowed by the Romans from Babylon…and in reality they worshipped Ishtar the goddess of Babylon but the Romans changed the name to Libertas in Latin, (Liberty, in English). So that, the Statue of Liberty is actually a pagan Idol image of Ishtar, the woman described in Revelation 17. If you don’t believe it…Look at Revelation 17: 4 & 5. Note the word for abomination. Bdelugma is from the root word Bdeoh. The Strong’s Code #946… " a foul thing, detestable, usually of idols…the root word means to "break wind", or to "pass gas"… indicating the odor smells like natural gas.
Well, speaking of natural gas…did you know that the Torch-cup of the Statue of Liberty burns an eternal flame…fueled by smelly natural gas? Also, of course… the Statue is referred to as the Mother of Exiles…an immigrant connection…just as the woman of Rev. 17: 1, 15 is also connected to immigrants. So too was Ishtar… she was the goddess of personal freedom… and an encouragement to immigrants.
AND LAST BUT BY NO MEANS THE LEAST… THE MOST LITERAL OF ALL:
#57. A Populated city named Babylon with a Deepwater Port.
Revelation 17:18; & 18: 11-19… Did you know that when ships coming in to the harbor facilities of New York City make their final approach to the Harbor channel shipping lanes…they have to come in from the south… heading due North straight for a spot on Long Island called … BABYLON !!! That’s right, the city of Babylon, which features a tall water tower that ship captains use to navigate directly into the harbor channel… and they come within 200 to 300 yards of the shore before turning west to head into the port. It is from this vantage point that I believe Revelation 18: 17-19 takes place. From this vantage point…on the deck of a ship…one could quite easily read the letters of the name Babylon on the city water tower!!!
Talk about literal?? Now that is indeed literal. This is something that theorists who promote the Rome = Babylon idea can’t match, because Rome is not a Deepwater seaport…it's so far away from the ocean that it can not possibly fit the description of Revelation 18: 17-19… in no way. But the USA can… and especially its chief city… a seaport named NYC/Babylon. Also, Babylon, Long Island derived its name because of it was founded by immigrant Jews in 1872…and the group’s rabbi’s chose the name almost prophetically, because they believed it would be home to a new diaspora.
Why would they think this? Because rabbinical opinions had held that ancient Babylon’s power would be moved… Zechariah 5: 5-11… and Isaiah 18:1 tells us what direction it would be moving. Isaiah 18:1 says that the spirit of Babylon would move west of the most outermost boundaries of ancient Babylon’s western-most border, beyond the rivers of Ethiopia and Egypt. [That is what is meant by the KJV term "Ethiopia"] By virtue of Isaiah’s point of observation being from Jerusalem…then the direction of movement was westward past Egypt…beyond the most outer of Babylon’s oldest boundaries… meaning… the occultic power that fueled Babylon would move and take up residence west of Egypt and Ethiopia in the end times. Rome is NOT west of Egypt and Ethiopia. Thus, again we have Rome ruled out of the picture by the character traits.
Thus, scripture itself negates the Rome = Babylon theory. Why will our "expert" scholars not accept the scriptural passages on this? Perhaps its pride or ignorance, I would suspect. Clearly, the only literal interpretation for this subject of "Mystery Babylon" from scripture is that it literally cannot be Rome. Why?
See and read again all 57 reasons that are listed above plus the 3 misconceptions that I show to be in error. Also follow up by reading other articles in this magazine issue and read the book, "America, The Babylon." Therefore, the only logical answer to the question: "Who is Mystery Babylon?" … is America? This researcher now believes this to be the case. If you have read Volume 1 of "America, The Babylon" and studied both the material in that book plus continue to study the material in this book, you too will no doubt come to a similar conclusion.
End of Excerpt #3
And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbor: the child shall behave himself proudly against the Lord, and the base against the honorable.
I will give the senator Inhofe credit at least he wasn't publicly afraid to come out and admit he is a racist. His republican counterparts could learn from his candor that in the current political environment its okay to confess bias racial attitudes at least it lets everybody know where you stand. Why should his white wife have to be subjected to the inconvenience of public searches at airports like everybody else? Hey they are white and that automatically means they are privileged American patriots which places them beyond suspicion.
Text of his statement:
by D. Large
I'm reminded of the line in the movie 'Training Day' when Denzel Washington's character Alonzo Harris said, "You have to have a little dirt on you before anybody can trust you." Unfortunately, for Errol Southers, Mr. Obama's choice as TSA director, that little dirt was to much for republicans. Southers withdrew his nomination because he received a reprimand for running background checks on his then-estranged wife's boyfriend two decades ago. Southers, a former FBI agent, wrote a letter to lawmakers earlier this month acknowledging that he had given inconsistent answers to Congress on that issue.BY NIRAJ WARIKOO
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER
Mourners attend the funeral service for Luqman Ameen Abdullah, 53, leader of the Masjid Al-Haqq mosque in Detroit on Oct. 31, 2009.
He called himself Jabril. Two years ago, a white man who claimed he was an ex-con and convert to Islam started attending a predominantly African-American mosque on a run-down street in Detroit.He touted his Islamic ways while offering poor members of the mosque cash for odd jobs at an auto shop on the city's west side. He told tales of sick family members and brought a young boy to the mosque who he said was his son.
Jabril soon became a brother in faith and a confidante of the mosque's fiery leader, Luqman Ameen Abdullah, who was killed in a shootout during an Oct. 28 raid by FBI agents to arrest men suspected of dealing in stolen goods.
Members now believe Jabril was an FBI informant who infiltrated their mosque.
"He built up trust in the community," said Omar Regan, 34, one of Abdullah's sons.
The case -- one of several in the past year involving informants in Muslim-American communities -- has prompted growing concern among Muslims and civil rights advocates about undercover surveillance in religious institutions.
Another unarmed black man shot dead by police and family receives no justice in court.
OAKLAND — The attorney for the family of an unarmed man shot to death by Oakland police officers says his clients are considering an appeal of a judge’s decision to dismiss their wrongful death lawsuit.
Attorney Jim Chanin said Saturday he disagreed with U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken’s ruling that two officers were justified in shooting 20-year-old Andrew Moppin-Buckskin during a 2007 traffic stop.
Wilken wrote in a Tuesday ruling in Oakland that officers Hector Jimenez and Jessica Borello shot Moppin-Buckskin only after he failed to follow their orders and made a movement toward his waist as though reaching for a weapon.
Jiminez was fired by the department after police say he fatally shot another unarmed man in 2008. He is appealing his termination.
The use of bleaching creams to lighten complexions seems to have reached epidemic proportions in Mali, despite widespread education campaigns.
Women who refuse to bleach often find themselves regarded as second class citizens.
A woman who did not bleach her skin said she is often not offered a chair at baptisms, and is asked to make herself scarce when group photographs are taken at marriages.
A quick survey shows there are more than 100 bleaching products available on the market in the capital, Bamako.
Sold under brand names such as Marie-Claire or Diana, the products come from Morocco, Nigeria, the United States or Saudi Arabia.
Pain
Dermatologists estimate that more than half the women in Mali are now using these creams to lighten their skin. These products are costly and often cause pain and blemishes.
So why are so many women in Mali using them? The answer is simple, according to one Malian woman singer: The creams make her white, and impart a certain charm.
But Malian physician Dr Ali Gindo finds bleached skin anything but charming.
"They are just burning themselves," he says. "It's painful and it's awful."
Dr Gindo says bleaching can cause skin cancer and the poorest people are the most at risk, because the cheaper the product, the more dangerous it is.
But he says it is not just poor women are bleaching their skin.
Role models
"We have also people who are well educated like lawyers, writers or professors, or people on the TV - and this is a real problem because if people who are leaders of opinion bleach themselves, you can imagine how deep the problem is."
Many of the women who use these products told me they do so because Malian men prefer women with bleached skin.
But male musician Al Hassan Soumali disagrees.
"I don't think Malian men like bleached women," he says. "It's better for Malian women to change their minds."
Blacks are disproportionately represented among the victims of police shootings. Although they represent approximately 14 percent of the population in the United States, in parts of the country they constitute 60 to 85 percent of the victims of police shootings. On average, Blacks are more than six times as likely as Whites to be shot by police, and in large cities are killed by police at least three times more often than Whites. Latinos (or Hispanics) are about twice as likely as Whites, but only half as likely as Blacks, to be shot and killed by police.There is a noticeable lack of data regarding police use of force against other non-Black minorities, such as Asian Americans, Arab Americans, South Asians and Native Americans. However, reports by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch suggest that, in relation to their representation in society at large, these other minorities are also disproportionately on the receiving end of police force
While widespread consensus exists that racial minorities are disproportionately represented as victims of police shootings, the reason for this disproportion is hotly disputed.
Most people who have an opinion believe racism on the part of police officers and police departments results in one trigger finger for racial minorities and another for Whites. According to this view, police officers intentionally single out racial minorities for harsher treatment.
In contrast others contend that race does not influence the average police officer's decision to use force. According to this perspective, Blacks and other non-Whites are disproportionately represented as victims of police shootings because they disproportionately commit armed robberies, carry firearms, and engage in behavior that police officers are likely to find threatening, such as resisting arrest.
These two perspectives frame the problem in all-or-nothing terms. Either police officers are bigots who intentionally target racial minorities or they are completely unbiased and color-blind. The truth more likely lies somewhere between these two extremes
Regardless of the scholarly debate the fact and reality of the situation bear out the truth that minorities have become victims of a pandemic of police violence.
"Obama wants to Show the Black voters that he cares about Black people and that is the only reason why he is sending help."
I usually don't comment on ignorant demagogues like Rush Limbaugh only because its really a waste of the human effort that could be better put to use in more productive and rewarding pleasures. Of course its much easier to talk about stupid guys than complex ideas. And don't construe this post as some defense for Obama. I respect the man and his family but I don't agree with his policies. I even respect Rush Limbaugh in spite of the fact he is an idiot. I even respect right wing conservative extremist in spite of the fact they are fascist.

January 8, 2010
More than 100 protesters demanding justice for a Bay Area man shot to death by a BART police officer on New Year's Day last year converged on a downtown Los Angeles courthouse today for the first proceedings since the racially charged case was moved here from Alameda County.
Johannes Mehserle, who resigned from the Bay Area Rapid Transit police force a week after the shooting he admits to but contends was unintentional, will stand trial for murder before Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry in May, the judge said at his pretrial hearing.
Perry prolonged a gag order issued by an Alameda County judge prohibiting either side in the case from discussing it in public. He also rejected a request from Bay Area broadcasters to allow televised coverage of the trial in light of the intense public interest in the shooting death that provoked three days of rioting that damaged dozens of Oakland businesses.
Mehserle, 28, has received death threats, as have his family and attorneys, posing a risk to the safety of witnesses who might testify on his behalf, Perry said in denying broadcast coverage of the proceedings for the benefit of Bay Area residents unable to travel to Los Angeles for the trial.
Mehserle's attorney, Michael Rains, told the court that his client wasn't contesting the cause of death in the Jan. 1, 2009, slaying of Oscar J. Grant III at Oakland's Fruitvale station. What is at issue in the case, Rains said, is the former officer's "intent" in the incident. It is rare for a police officer to be charged with murder in an on-duty shooting due to the qualified immunity accorded law enforcement.
Many of the protesters who picketed the courthouse traveled from the Bay Area to hoist placards demanding justice for Grant, the 22-year-old Hayward man shot to death as BART officers were trying to subdue a trainload of unruly New Year's revelers.
Dozens of witnesses reported seeing the white officer shoot Grant, who is black, including some who captured the killing on cellphone cameras.
Mehserle told Alameda County authorities at preliminary court proceedings that he was reaching for his stun gun and accidentally drew his revolver instead.
"There are thousands of Oscar Grants everyday," Hannibal Shakur, a 23-year-old Oakland student making a documentary about the victim, said in front of the crowd outside the courthouse.
"It was a shame. It was a clear murder," Shakur said. "Young brothers get killed by the police everyday. I'm guessing (Mehserle) won't be held accountable. L.A. has a history. If they wanted to give us justice, they could have done that in Oakland."
The trial was moved to Southern California because of the high publicity surrounding the case in the Bay Area.
-- Carol J. Williams and Gerrick D. Kennedy
In the five days since the abortive attempt by the 23-year-old Nigerian student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to detonate an explosive device onboard Northwest Flight 253, information has surfaced that indicates an ostensible breakdown in US intelligence and security that is extraordinary in both its character and scale.
Among the facts now known are the following:
• Abdulmutallab’s father, a prominent retired banker and ex-government minister, had visited the US Embassy in Abuja more than a month before the attempted bombing to warn CIA officials that his son had become involved with Al Qaeda elements in Yemen. He provided them with information with which the young man could have been located, and he followed up his visit with at least two phone calls.
• For at least four months, US intelligence had information from Yemen that Al Qaeda operatives there were preparing “a Nigerian” for a terrorist attack.
• The information from Yemen was further substantiated by the National Security Agency’s interception of communications discussing preparations for an impending attack and the use of the “Nigerian.”
Moreover, Abdulmutallab’s $2,800 ticket was paid for with cash, apparently at the last minute, and he made the transatlantic trip having checked no luggage, carrying only a backpack.
Then there is the story told by a passenger on the plane, Kurt Haskell, a Michigan lawyer, who claims that he saw Abdulmutallab approach the airline ticket counter in Amsterdam accompanied by a well-dressed South Asian man, who told the Northwest ticket agent that the young Nigerian needed to fly without a passport.
“He’s from Sudan, we do this all the time,” the older man told the agent, Haskell recounted. He said that the agent then directed them to the office of the airline’s local manager.
Normally, any one of these things would have triggered intense scrutiny before Abdulmutallab was allowed to board the plane.
Once again, as in the wake of September 11, 2001, the government and the media are peddling the explanation that all of these extraordinary lapses were the product of mere negligence or a “failure to connect the dots.”
Eight years after 9/11, with all of the still unanswered questions surrounding the attacks that were used to justify an explosion of American militarism, the attempt to gloss over an event that nearly cost the lives of 300 people with this hackneyed metaphor does not hold water.
The general outlines of the Northwest bombing attempt and the 9/11 attacks are startlingly similar. One might even say that what is involved is a modus operandi. In both cases, those alleged to have carried out the actions had been the subject of US intelligence investigations and surveillance and had been allowed to enter the country and board flights under conditions that would normally have set off multiple security alarms.
Both then and now, the government and the media expect the public to accept that all that was involved was mistakes. But why should anyone assume that the failure to act on the extensive intelligence leading to Abdulmutallab involved merely “innocent” mistakes—and not something far more sinister?
If this episode is to be examined seriously, the question must be asked: What would have happened had Northwest Flight 253 been destroyed?
There is no question but that such a catastrophe would have had immense repercussions both internationally and within the United States. It would have seriously destabilized the Obama administration, politically strengthened the most extreme right-wing sections of the ruling class, and cleared the way for an even more massive expansion of military-intelligence operations overseas and a drastic curtailing of democratic rights at home.
Even the failed attempt has touched off a firestorm of criticism by the Republican right of the Obama administration’s supposed laxity in the face of terrorism.
This found its distilled expression in a statement released Wednesday by former Vice President Dick Cheney.
“We are at war, and when President Obama pretends we aren’t, it makes us less safe,” said Cheney. The former vice president and de facto leader of the “war on terror” in the Bush administration condemned Obama for proposing to close down the Guantánamo prison camp and try some of those held there in normal federal courts. He also denounced the US president for jettisoning the words “war on terror” in describing Washington’s continuing wars abroad and attacks on democratic rights at home.
The statements from Cheney—who was at the center of a secret government for eight years, has the closest ties to the military-intelligence apparatus, and is a ruthless advocate of torture, assassinations and a sweeping curtailment of democratic rights—shed light on the political calculations that may have encouraged elements within the CIA and related agencies to keep the “dots” separated and, thereby, facilitate a terrorist action.
Increasingly, the failure to identify Abdulmutallab and alert other government agencies to the threat revealed in Nigeria and Yemen has been attributed to the CIA. How many of the key figures in this agency had close connections to Cheney?
The key to this event may well lie in bitter struggles over policy taking place within the ruling establishment and the state. Despite all that Obama has done to continue the policies of the Bush administration, both in terms of aggressive war abroad and the buildup of police state powers at home, there are elements who want to go much further.
On Tuesday, for the second day in a row, Obama issued a public statement on the abortive airline bombing.
“When our government has information on a known extremist and that information is not shared and acted upon as it should have been, so that this extremist boards a plane with dangerous explosives that could cost nearly 300 lives, a systemic failure has occurred,” said Obama in the statement from Hawaii.
This second statement—delivered just one day after Obama’s announcement that he had ordered a “thorough review” of intelligence procedures—reflects the divisions and recriminations within the Washington political establishment and the US intelligence agencies. It is indicative of the immense pressure being brought to bear on his administration, and his own recognition that a successful terrorist attack would have had a profoundly destabilizing effect on his presidency.
There can be no serious investigation into how the Northwest Airline bombing plot was allowed to go so far without considering whether there are elements within the US state that had an interest in seeing it happen, and therefore in suppressing the intelligence and bypassing procedures that would have stopped it.
Getting to the bottom of these questions is impossible without identifying the specific individuals who saw the information on Abdulmutallab and made the critical decisions which blocked careful surveillance and action.
In its editorial Wednesday entitled “The System Failed,” the New York Times cites the voluminous intelligence on Abdulmutallab and writes, “Officials say the warning was insufficient.” It further states, “Officials decided that the warning wasn’t enough to put him on the list of 14,000 people subjected to more thorough airport searches.”
The Times attributes these decisions to “bad judgment calls.” As always, this voice of the erstwhile US liberal establishment can be counted on to provide the most trivial and unserious explanation for what is a deadly serious matter.
Who are these “officials?” They should be named. Moreover, they should be subpoenaed, publically questioned under oath, and compelled to explain their decisions.
Asking the question, who would benefit politically from a major terrorist attack on US soil, holds the best promise of shedding light on what is unbelievably presented as a staggering and inexplicable “breakdown” of Washington’s intelligence and security systems.
American mobs lynched some 5.000 Blacks since 1859, scores of whom were women, several of them pregnant. Rarely did the killers spend time in jail because the white mobs and the government officials who protected them believed justice meant (just us) white folks. Lynching denied Blacks the right to a trial or the right to due process. No need for a lawyer and a jury of your peers: the white community decided what happened and what ought to be done. After the whites accused Laura Nelson of killing a white deputy In Oklahoma, they raped this Black woman, tied her to a bridge trestle and for good measure, They lynched her son from a telephone pole. Had the white community reacted in horror after viewing the dangling corpses of Laura Nelson and her son? No, they came by the hundreds, making their way by cars, horse driven wagons, and by foot to view the lynching. Dressed in their Sunday best, holding their children’s hands and hugging their babies the white on-lookers looked forward to witnessing the spectacle of a modern day crucifixion. They snapped pictures of Laura Nelson, placed them on postcards and mailed them to their friends boasting about the execution. They chopped of f the fingers, sliced off the ears of Ms. Holbert, placed the parts In jars of alcohol and displayed them in their windows.
White America today know little or nothing about lynching because it contradicts every value America purports to stand for. Blacks, too, know far too little about the lynchings because the subject is rarely taught in school. Had they known more about these lynchings, I am almost certain that Blacks would have taken anyone to task, including gangster rappers, for calling themselves niggers or calling Black women “hoes” and “bitches.” How could anybody in their right mind call these Black women who were sexually abused, mutilated, tortured and mocked the same degrading Please do not throw this away. Give it to a friend or a names that the psychopathic lynchers called them? relative. Peace.
What Black woman in her right state of mind would snap her fingers or tap her feet to the beat of a song that contained the same degrading remarks that the whites uttered when they raped and lynched them The lynchers and the thousands of gleeful spectators called these Black women niggers when they captured them, niggers when they placed the rope around their necks and niggers when their necks snapped. Whites viewed Black women as hated black things, for, how else can one explain the treatment of Mary Turner? The lynch mob ignored her cries for mercy, ripped off her clothes, tied her ankles together, turned her upside down, doused her naked body with gas and oil, set her naked body on fire, ripped her baby out of her, stomped the child to death and laughed about it. Blacks purchased Winchesters to protect themselves, staged demonstrations, created anti-lynching organizations, pushed for anti-lynching legislation and published articles and books attacking the extralegal violence. Many pocked up. left the community never to return again. Others went through bouts of sadness, despair, and grief. Some broke down, a few went insane. Others probably fell on their knees, put their hands together, closed their eyes and begged Jesus for help. Jesus help us. Do not forsake us. But Jesus. the same white man the lyncher’s ancestors taught us to love, never flew out of the bush in a flame of fire armed with frogs and files and locusts to save Mary Turner. No thunder, no rain, no hail and no fire blocked the lynchers from hanging Laura Nelson. He did not see the “affliction” of the Holberts; he did not hear the screams of Marie Scott or the cry of Jennifer Steers.
So who are our real heroes?. Little Kim Is not a hero. Oprah is not a hero.. Whoople Goldberg is not a hero. Michael Jordan is not a hero. Dennis Rodman Is not a hero. They are entertainers, sport figures. creations of the media, media icons and they are about making huge sums of money and we wish these enterprising stars well. . Mary Turner, Laura Nelson, Marie Scott and Jennie Steers are your true historical heroes. Niggers they were not. Bitches they were not. Hoes they were not. They will not go down in history for plastering their bodies with tattoos, inventing exotic diets, endorsing Gator Ade, embracing studIo gangsterism, They were strong beautiful Black women who suffered excruciating pain, died horrible deaths. Their legacy of -strength lives on. These are my heroes. Make them yours as well.
A grand jury ruled Wednesday that the fatal shooting of an unarmed black man by two white police officers at a daycare facility filled with children was justified, an official said.
Human rights organizations, both political and social , are condemning what they are calling a new form of inhumane exploitation in the United States, where they say a prison population of up to 2 million - mostly Black and Hispanic- are working for various industries for a pittance. For the tycoons who have invested in the prison industry, it has been like finding a pot of gold. They don’t have to worry about strikes or paying unemployment insurance, vacations or comp time. All of their workers are full-time and never arrive late or are absent because of family problems; moreover, if they don’t like the pay of 25 cents an hour and refuse to work, they are locked up in isolation cells.
Back in 1964, Malcolm X wrote that blacks were getting beat up but were suffering in silence, like a patient in the dentist's chair, even with "blood running all down your jaw." They didn't know what was happening to them because of the Novocain the dentist had given them, he said.
While president Obama occupies the Whitehouse giving the appearance to the American public that he is in deep contemplation and thoughtful review about troop increases in Afghanistan he may just win an Academy Award Oscar,to sit next to his Nobel Peace prize, for his performance as a tortured president looking out for the best interest of the American public.
Apparently, times aren't so tough all over.Outrageous… and Unjust!
This is outrageous and unjust!
How many change-of-venue motions by defendants were granted in California during the entire year of 2008? None! And the legal trend is away from granting them (according to news reports and the Alameda County District Attorney’s motion opposing the venue change). Yet in this case, an exception was made.
Asking for a change of venue has been used repeatedly to acquit cops who’ve committed the most heinous crimes. And when these motions are granted, it usually means searching for a rural or suburban venue where a lot of people don’t believe a cop would murder a Black man in cold blood and for no reason in front of witnesses, as happened to Oscar Grant.
Two examples:
The police who killed Amadou Diallo in the Bronx in 1999 when he reached for his wallet were acquitted after the trial was moved to Albany in upstate New York, where people are more predisposed—due to their life experiences—to accept police lies than in New York City.
The Los Angeles police who were videotaped beating Rodney King were acquitted in their first trial, in 1992, when that trial was moved to suburban—and largely white—Simi Valley. The court’s decision to move the Rodney King trial out of Los Angeles (and the legal arguments it included) were repeatedly cited by Mehserle’s lawyer and the judge to move the Oscar Grant case.
In the course of arguing for a change of venue, and in a motion that overall covered up and distorted reality, Mehserle’s lawyers presented some revealing truths in their change of venue motion. Mehserle’s motion states:
“...there can be no doubt that police officers shoot and kill black citizens of this county at a proportion far higher than their proportion of the population... it is impossible to dispute the impression left by the numbers, an impression held by significant numbers of potential jurors in this County: if you’re a black person in Alameda County, it’s dangerous to deal with the police.” (p. 62 of Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Change of Venue)
The motion then cites damning statistics: “...in this county blacks are the targets of police homicides determined to be justifiable at a rate about three times that of their proportion of the population. There were forty-eight such killings between 1999 and 2008 and African Americans were the targets of some 41% of these homicides, though they make up only about 13.5% of the population of the County.” (Motion, p. 8) Further, “between 2004 and 2008, there were 45 police shootings in Oakland alone. Although blacks make up about a third of Oakland’s population, they were the targets in 85 percent of the shootings.” (Motion p. 8, 9, italics in the original)
But Mehserle’s lawyers presented this as evidence for why the trial should be moved to a community where people are ignorant of this reality, and where their ideas about police and what they do are more conditioned by cop shows and mainstream media distortions. The underlying logic is that a “fair trial” of a police officer requires a jury, or a community and a trial environment, that is predisposed to look upon the police favorably, and doesn’t have the experience or sophistication or ability to think critically to be skeptical of police.
And the judge ruled Mehserle could not get a fair trial in Alameda County, in part, because a survey presented by Mehserle’s lawyers claimed that “70% of potential jurors have prejudged defendant’s guilt or innocence already.” Yet even according to this survey less than half the people questioned felt that Mehserle was guilty.
In “The Status of the Victim” section of his ruling, the judge states that as a result of publicity, Oscar Grant “has been personified, humanized and cast in a sympathetic light since his death.” He concludes that these circumstances “favor changing venue.”
Stop and think about that. In this era of so-called “victims’ rights,” victims of at least certain kinds of crimes are routinely “personified, humanized and cast in a sympathetic light.” Yet in this case a whole different set of rules has been invoked, so that, bizarrely, the fact that the victim of a horrible crime has been recognized as a human being is invoked as a reason why the man who killed him cannot get a fair trial in the county where the crime took place.
When have you ever heard of a criminal case, at any stage of trial, where the defense presents thousands of pages of evidence while the prosecution presents almost none? In this case, the District Attorney’s office—the prosecution—did formally oppose the change of venue motion, but it did not vigorously fight this and in many ways paved the way for the judge’s decision.
For instance, the judge noted in his ruling that “massive documentary exhibits were admitted into evidence at this hearing,” And, he acknowledged, “Almost all of the evidence offered and admitted in this hearing was produced by the defense.”
What would it have meant for a prosecutor in this case to actively oppose the change of venue? The prosecution would have to argue that people in the inner cities do live under systemic police terror, and that people who experience this would make them better judges of the evidence in this case. And that is something that no prosecutor in this system could or would do.
This, too, is part of a pattern. Repeatedly, when it is actually a cop on trial, the prosecutors act like they forgot how to prosecute. They present weak cases, cross-examine with kid gloves, and generally accept the terms of the cop’s defense lawyers.
The judge’s main argument for moving the Oscar Grant trial is that there’s been too much protest. In his ruling, he states: “This intense political activity and local turmoil that is now, and has been, an ever-present part of this case, is a factor weighing very heavily in favor of a venue change.”
He added: “These jurors will be exposed to protestors’ angry demand for ‘justice for Oscar Grant’ each time they go in and out of the courthouse, a constant reminder of the impending civil unrest. These jurors also likely will be concerned about the real possibility of more riots and violence depending on the verdict they choose. Under these circumstances, there is a reasonable probability that defendant cannot get a fair trial. This situation is the present reality.”
First point: Protest is not illegal. People should protest terrible crimes and injustice. Second, point: Protest is the only reason why there is a chance for justice for Oscar Grant. The fact that protest, and fighting for justice for victims of police murder justifies moving a trial, that itself is a revealing exposure of the nature of this system, and its legal system.
Between 2004 and 2008, there were 45 “officer-involved shootings” by Oakland cops—80 percent of those shot were Black men. None were prosecuted or disciplined in any way. In the last 15 years, there have been over 2,000 police killings in the U.S.—yet there were only six cases in which murder charges were filed against police, and none resulted in convictions.
The trial of Johannes Mehserle is, according to his lawyers, the first trial of a police officer for a murder committed while on duty in the history of California. This is a searing exposure of how the system protects murdering cops—hundreds of people have been killed by cops in California, and not a single murder trial until now.
What was the difference in this case? And why is there a chance of justice? Only because people first defied police intimidation and threats to record the murder on their cell phones, and then because people persisted in courageously going into the streets to demand justice in the face of police brutality and arrests.
Again, where does everyday, ongoing, pervasive violence and intimidation come from for youth like Oscar Grant in this society? What violent force has already tried to terrorize witnesses in this case by trying to seize people’s cell phones who recorded the killing, and attacking and arresting people who have been in the streets demanding justice? The protestors who fought for justice for Oscar Grant have had to go up against the “threat of violence” by the police. People who testify against the police do so at great risk.
* * *
Under capitalism, the law protects exploitation, and all the social relations in this society. In theory, the law—unjust as it is—is enforced equally; both the rich and the poor are prohibited from stealing a loaf of bread to feed their hungry children. But in reality, not only is the law unjust, enforcement of the law is wildly skewed when the interests of the system are at stake.
In justifying his change of venue ruling, the judge in this case wrote: “Defendant’s status as a police officer is a factor that weighs heavily in favor of a venue change…” In other words: a special set of rules applies to killer cops.
The only reason that there is a chance for justice for Oscar Grant is that there has been protest and public outrage. And the only hope that there will be justice in this case is ongoing and more protest and outrage. And that anger, that outrage, and that courageous protest can become part of building up a revolutionary movement to bring to an end the system that routinely murders young Black and Latino men with impunity.
Although by most measures I had a great career in the insurance industry (four years at Humana and nearly 15 at CIGNA), in recent years I had grown increasingly uncomfortable serving as one of the industry's top PR executives. In addition to my responsibilities at CIGNA, which included serving as the company's chief spokesman to the media on all corporate and financial matters, I also served on a lot of trade association committees and industry-financed coalitions, many of which were essentially front groups for insurers. So I was in a unique position to see not only how Wall Street analysts and investors influence decisions insurance company executives make but also how the industry has carried out behind-the-scenes PR and lobbying campaigns to kill or weaken any health care reform efforts that threatened insurers' profitability.
I also have seen how the industry's practices -- especially those of the for-profit insurers that are under constant pressure from Wall Street to meet their profit expectations -- have contributed to the tragedy of nearly 50 million people being uninsured as well as to the growing number of Americans who, because insurers now require them to pay thousands of dollars out of their own pockets before their coverage kicks in -- are underinsured. An estimated 25 million of us now fall into that category.
What I saw happening over the past few years was a steady movement away from the concept of insurance and toward "individual responsibility," a term used a lot by insurers and their ideological allies. This is playing out as a continuous shifting of the financial burden of health care costs away from insurers and employers and onto the backs of individuals. As a result, more and more sick people are not going to the doctor or picking up their prescriptions because of costs. If they are unfortunate enough to become seriously ill or injured, many people enrolled in these plans find themselves on the hook for such high medical bills that they are losing their homes to foreclosure or being forced into bankruptcy.
As an industry spokesman, I was expected to put a positive spin on this trend that the industry created and euphemistically refers to as "consumerism" and to promote so-called "consumer-driven" health plans. I ultimately reached the point of feeling like a huckster.
I thought I could live with being a well-paid huckster and hang in there a few more years until I could retire. I probably would have if I hadn't made a completely spur-of-the-moment decision a couple of years ago that changed the direction of my life. While visiting my folks in northeast Tennessee where I grew up, I read in the local paper about a health "expedition" being held that weekend a few miles up U.S. 23 in Wise, Va. Doctors, nurses and other medical professionals were volunteering their time to provide free medical care to people who lived in the area. What intrigued me most was that Remote Area Medical, a non-profit group whose original mission was to provide free care to people in remote villages in South America, was organizing the expedition. I decided to check it out.
That 50-mile stretch of U.S. 23, which twists through the mountains where thousands of men have made their living working in the coalmines, turned out to be my "road to Damascus."
Nothing could have prepared me for what I saw when I reached the Wise County Fairgrounds, where the expedition was being held. Hundreds of people had camped out all night in the parking lot to be assured of seeing a doctor or dentist when the gates opened. By the time I got there, long lines of people stretched from every animal stall and tent where the volunteers were treating patients.
That scene was so visually and emotionally stunning it was all I could do to hold back tears. How could it be that citizens of the richest nation in the world were being treated this way?
A couple of weeks later I was boarding a corporate jet to fly from Philadelphia to a meeting in Connecticut. When the flight attendant served my lunch on gold-rimmed china and gave me a gold-plated knife and fork to eat it with, I realized for the first time that someone's insurance premiums were paying for me to travel in such luxury. I also realized that one of the reasons those people in Wise County had to wait in long lines to be treated in animal stalls was because our Wall Street-driven health care system has created one of the most inequitable health care systems on the planet.
Although I quit my job last year, I did not make a final decision to speak out as a former insider until recently when it became clear to me that the insurance industry and its allies (often including drug and medical device makers, business groups and even the American Medical Association) were succeeding in shaping the current debate on health care reform. While the thought of speaking out had crossed my mind during the months leading up to the day I gave notice, I initially decided instead to hang out my shingle as a consultant to small businesses and nonprofit organizations.
I decided to take the shingle down, though, at least for a while, when I heard members of Congress reciting talking points like the ones I used to write to scare people away from real reform. I'll have more to say about that over the coming weeks and months, but, for now, remember this: whenever you hear a politician or pundit use the term "government-run health care" and warn that the creation of a public health insurance option that would compete with private insurers (or heaven forbid, a single-payer system like the one Canada has) will "lead us down the path to socialism," know that the original source of the sound bite most likely was some flack like I used to be.
Bottom line: I ultimately decided the stakes are too high for me to just sit on the sidelines and let the special interests win again. So I have joined forces with thousands of other Americans who are trying to persuade our lawmakers to listen to us for a change, not just to the insurance and drug company executives who are spending millions to shape reform to benefit them and the Wall Street hedge fund managers they are beholden to.
Take it from me, a former insider, who knows what really motivates those folks. You need to know where the hard-earned money you pay in health insurance premiums -- if you lucky enough to have coverage at all -- really goes.
I decided to speak out knowing that some people will not like what I have to say and will do all they can to discredit me. In anticipation of that, here are some facts:
I am not doing this because my former employer was pushing me out the door or because I had become a disgruntled employee. I had not been passed over for a promotion or anything like that. As I noted earlier, I had a financially rewarding career in the industry, and I'm very grateful for that. I had numerous promotions, raises, bonuses, stock options and stock grants over the years. When I left my last job, I was as close on the corporate ladder to the CEO as any PR person has ever climbed at the company. I reported to the general counsel, the company's top lawyer, whose boss is the chairman and CEO, a man I like and worked closely with over many years.
The decision to leave was entirely my own, and I left on good terms with everybody at the company. In fact, I agreed to postpone my last day at work by more than two months at the company's request. My coworkers gave me a terrific going-away party, and I received dozens of kind notes from people all across the country including friends at other companies and at America's Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade association.
I still consider all of them my friends. In fact, the thing I have missed most since I left is working as part of a team, even though I eventually came to the conclusion that I was playing for the wrong side. Being a consultant has its advantages, but I have missed the camaraderie. After a few months, I thought that maybe I should consider working for another company again. At one point, a former boss told me that another insurer had posted a PR job and encouraged me to contact a former CIGNA executive who worked there about it. Against my better judgment, I did, but I immediately decided not to pursue it. The last thing I wanted to do was to go from one big insurer to another one. What the hell was I thinking?
I'm writing this because, knowing how things work, I'm fully expecting insurers' PR firms to quietly feed friends of the industry (which include a roster of editorial writers and pundits, lawmakers and many others who fall under the broad category of "third-party advocates,") with anything they can think of to discredit me and what I say. This will go on behind the scenes because the insurers will want to preserve the image they are working so hard to cultivate -- as a group of kind and caring folks who think only of you and your health and are working hard as real partners to Congress and the White House to find "a uniquely American solution" to what ails our system.
I expect this because I have worked closely with the industry's PR firms over many years whenever the insurers were being threatened with bad publicity, litigation or legislation that might hinder profits.
One of the reasons I chose to become affiliated with the Center for Media and Democracy is because of the important work the organization does to expose often devious, dishonest and unethical PR practices that further the self interests of big corporations and special interest groups at the expense of the American people and the democratic principles this country was founded on.
After a long career in PR, I am looking forward to providing an insider's perspective as a senior fellow at CMD, and I am very grateful for the opportunity to speak out for the rights and dignity of ordinary people. The people of Wise County and every county deserve much better than to be left behind to suffer or die ahead of their time due to Wall Street's efforts to keep our government from ensuring that all Americans have real access to first-class health care.
Wendell Potter is the Senior Fellow on Health Care for the Center for Media and Democracy in Madison, Wisconsin.
VANCOUVER, Wash. -- Korry Holtzlander achieved the American Dream, and it grossed him out.
The Regifting Store is 7,500 square feet of retail space in Vancouver's McLoughlin Heights. Beneficiaries of the store include everyone from homeless provider Open House Ministries to some under-supported youth mentoring programs that Holtzlander thinks deserve a lot more help.
What drove him to downsize his life, sell off his stuff, stop thinking about retirement and start thinking about others? He traces the unusual path he's on to the homeless man he found sleeping in a car on his sales lot in 2006. Holtzlander didn't call the police - he offered the man a cup of coffee and, eventually, a job. Then there were more jobs for more needy men who found their way to him. Then he bought a house to put up homeless people, no questions asked.
"I got overwhelmed with all the people coming for help," he said. "I realized how many people need help."
He formed a nonprofit corporation called Light of Man and tried to fulfill his vision halfway - by holding fundraisers, running errands, serving the needy while continuing to sell cars and pull down a serious salary. But the fundraisers got old, he said, and some friends got a little tired of his ongoing crusade.
Eventually, Holtzlander, 42, decided on a new approach. He noticed Goodwill stores "going up like crazy" and doing great business recycling one person's surplus as another person's staple.
"Money is scarce. What's not scarce is stuff," he said. "We've had such a good economy for so long, everybody's got stuff."
Almost everybody, that is. Holtzlander went looking for a storefront where he could help poor people find the clothes, furniture and other goods they need. He was priced out of downtown. He stumbled across an appropriate venue when he helped his brother do some roofing at the MacArthur Center strip mall. A big retail space there had been vacant ever since the previous tenant, a nonprofit agency called the Lighthouse that hosted recovery meetings for drug and alcohol addicts, closed its doors.
Even then, Holtzlander said, the upfront costs and remodeling expenses would have been prohibitive - except that he was able to offer the landlord his own (and his brother's) remodeling skills in exchange for a break on rent. Now, about two months into the life of the new Regifting Store, the place is just about squeaking by.
Furniture and tableware, clothes and shoes, books and videos, paintings and electronics all available for a deeply discounted price. In fact, Holtzlander said, he's liable to let items go for free if the need is really great.
"I cannot believe the needs that walk through that door," he said. He's met terminally ill people who have no home, children with parents in jail, ex-convicts who've straightened out but whose criminal records prevent them from finding jobs, and just-plain folks who are down on their luck during a very tough economic time.
But he's also blown away by the spirit of service that's carrying the project along. There's literally no staff at the Regifting Store, he said, because everything is done by volunteers, including his daughters, Ashley and Holly. Holtzlander said he doesn't take a dime out of the operation, and he and his wife are living off her nurse's salary.
"I am retired and recently widowed," said volunteer Chris Frey, who took a break from stocking shelves to chat. "I think this is a wonderful, worthwhile store. If I can help out, I am glad to do it."
"I started volunteering here because they help Open House Ministries," said Linda McHan, who works for a few hours most days of the week.
Holtzlander said all store proceeds are funneled to local charities, nonprofits and individuals in need. He's so interested in alleviating misery, he said, that occasionally his wife, Debbie, has to put her foot down and prevent him from giving away the whole store.
"I guess I don't have the best business sense," said the former businessman. "She keeps steering me right."
The home he bought for the homeless will have to go, he said, because it's a money pit and not all his tenants have proved trustworthy. Meanwhile, he and Debbie hope to sell the family property in Hockinson even though they love it and move someplace more modest and economical.
Motivating all these changes, he said, is an unquenchable sense of imbalance in society, that some people have an embarrassment of riches while others can barely survive.
"No man should have more than he needs," he said. "Nobody should have an abundance while his neighbor doesn't have what he needs."
But wait isn't that socialism?
"Socialism, yes, I am 100 percent in favor of socialism," he said. "I don't mind you saying that. That's it."
But make that a bottom-up style of socialism, he added, driven by individual charity and neighborliness, not by government programs. He said he wishes average folks would assess their real needs and expenses, and make some cuts and donations accordingly.
"What if we just cut out cable bills?" he wondered. "What if everybody in Clark County cut their cable and took that 38 bucks a month and did something positive with it? We wouldn't need government programs for the poor."
American mobs lynched some 5.000 Blacks since 1859, scores of whom were women, several of them pregnant. Rarely did the killers spend time in jail because the white mobs and the government officials who protected them believed justice meant (just us) white folks. Lynching denied Blacks the right to a trial or the right to due process. No need for a lawyer and a jury of your peers: the white community decided what happened and what ought to be done. After the whites accused Laura Nelson of killing a white deputy In Oklahoma, they raped this Black woman, tied her to a bridge trestle and for good measure, They lynched her son from a telephone pole. Had the white community reacted in horror after viewing the dangling corpses of Laura Nelson and her son? No, they came by the hundreds, making their way by cars, horse driven wagons, and by foot to view the lynching. Dressed in their Sunday best, holding their children’s hands and hugging their babies the white on-lookers looked forward to witnessing the spectacle of a modern day crucifixion. They snapped pictures of Laura Nelson, placed them on postcards and mailed them to their friends boasting about the execution. They chopped of f the fingers, sliced off the ears of Ms. Holbert, placed the parts In jars of alcohol and displayed them in their windows.
White America today know little or nothing about lynching because it contradicts every value America purports to stand for. Blacks, too, know far too little about the lynchings because the subject is rarely taught in school. Had they known more about these lynchings, I am almost certain that Blacks would have taken anyone to task, including gangster rappers, for calling themselves niggers or calling Black women “hoes” and “bitches.” How could anybody in their right mind call these Black women who were sexually abused, mutilated, tortured and mocked the same degrading Please do not throw this away. Give it to a friend or a names that the psychopathic lynchers called them? relative. Peace.
What Black woman in her right state of mind would snap her fingers or tap her feet to the beat of a song that contained the same degrading remarks that the whites uttered when they raped and lynched them The lynchers and the thousands of gleeful spectators called these Black women niggers when they captured them, niggers when they placed the rope around their necks and niggers when their necks snapped. Whites viewed Black women as hated black things, for, how else can one explain the treatment of Mary Turner? The lynch mob ignored her cries for mercy, ripped off her clothes, tied her ankles together, turned her upside down, doused her naked body with gas and oil, set her naked body on fire, ripped her baby out of her, stomped the child to death and laughed about it. Blacks purchased Winchesters to protect themselves, staged demonstrations, created anti-lynching organizations, pushed for anti-lynching legislation and published articles and books attacking the extralegal violence. Many pocked up. left the community never to return again. Others went through bouts of sadness, despair, and grief. Some broke down, a few went insane. Others probably fell on their knees, put their hands together, closed their eyes and begged Jesus for help. Jesus help us. Do not forsake us. But Jesus. the same white man the lyncher’s ancestors taught us to love, never flew out of the bush in a flame of fire armed with frogs and files and locusts to save Mary Turner. No thunder, no rain, no hail and no fire blocked the lynchers from hanging Laura Nelson. He did not see the “affliction” of the Holberts; he did not hear the screams of Marie Scott or the cry of Jennifer Steers.
So who are our real heroes?. Little Kim Is not a hero. Oprah is not a hero.. Whoople Goldberg is not a hero. Michael Jordan is not a hero. Dennis Rodman Is not a hero. They are entertainers, sport figures. creations of the media, media icons and they are about making huge sums of money and we wish these enterprising stars well. . Mary Turner, Laura Nelson, Marie Scott and Jennie Steers are your true historical heroes. Niggers they were not. Bitches they were not. Hoes they were not. They will not go down in history for plastering their bodies with tattoos, inventing exotic diets, endorsing Gator Ade, embracing studIo gangsterism, They were strong beautiful Black women who suffered excruciating pain, died horrible deaths. Their legacy of -strength lives on. These are my heroes. Make them yours as well.
DCFS says scene of fatal police action is not part of licensed facility at House of Grace.ROCKFORD — Details from a lawsuit against the city and its Police Department support findings of the state’s child welfare agency that a church day care was operating properly at the time of a fatal police shooting.
According to the lawsuit, filed Oct. 16 in Winnebago County Court, Rockford police officers Stanton North and Oda Poole were pursuing Mark Anthony Barmore of Rockford for alleged criminal activity Aug. 24, and Barmore entered the Kingdom Authority International Ministries Church House of Grace day care and school.
The lawsuit also states Barmore, 23, ran into an equipment room inside a children’s play area in the basement of the school, which is where the shooting took place.
The children’s play area is not considered part of the state-licensed day care facility housed within the church, said Department of Child and Family Services spokesman Kendall Marlowe. Of the 10 children ages 5 to 11 who were in the play room when Barmore was shot to death, none were enrolled in the DCFS-licensed day care program, which is located in another area of the church and caters strictly to children ages 6 weeks to 3 years.
“It is my understanding that what transpired was a man ducked into the building, ran through a foyer area and into the basement,” Marlowe said. “The door to the day care was not open.”
The shooting remains under investigation by Illinois State Police and members of the Cook County Public Integrity Task Force. Police say Barmore grabbed one of the officer’s guns and a struggle ensued. Day care employees say Barmore, who was unarmed, emerged from the storage room with his hands up and there was no struggle.
As far as DCFS is concerned, Marlowe said the agency was made aware of the shooting and responded. The agency did not and does not plan to investigate the day care for licensing violations or allegations of abuse or neglect in relation to the shooting, Marlowe said.
“We have no indication that the day care center acted improperly during this tragedy,” he said. “DCFS licensing standards and regulations regarding security and emergency situations are reasonable. A day care facility cannot be expected to prevent such a highly unusual incident.”
The church is suing the city, police department and the officers for what it is calling “reckless” actions that placed day care and school employees and 10 children in harm’s way and caused them to suffer emotional distress.
The suit states that there were about 150 children in the building at the time of the shooting. The church runs a day care, preschool and programs for older children.
The officers’ actions placed House of Grace employees and children “in the zone of danger,” said Keenan J. Saulter, the Chicago attorney who is representing the church.
“I’ve never seen anyone shot or been present when someone was killed. I don’t think most people have,” Saulter said. “It’s not a normal experience. It’s traumatic, and that’s exacerbated for a child who doesn’t have the same coping mechanisms as an adult. It’s a huge emotional burden.”
Attorneys for the church, employees and children seek damages of more than $75,000.
"I've wasted my life", words of a mother who had just shot and killed one son and critically wounded another.
Stolen Lives: Killed by Law Enforcement
NORTH
Tarika Wilson, Lima, Ohio
Devon Young, Chicago, Illinois
Corey Harris, Chicago, Illinois
LaTanya Haggerty, Chicago, Illinois
Brandon Harper, Riverdale, Illinois
Mark A. Barmore, Rockford, Illinois
Fong Lee, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Julius Johnson, Muskegon, Michigan
SOUTH
Tremaine Miller, Atlanta, Georigia
DeAunta T. Farrow, Memphis, Tennessee
Chester Colburn, Fayetteville, North Carolina
Roy Glenn Jr., Humboldt, Tennessee
David Willis, Savannah, Georgia
Katheryn Johnston, Atlanta, Georgia
Bernard Monroe, Homer, Louisianan
Harold Phillips, Colfax, Louisianan
Sema Shehada. Miami, Florida
EAST
Patrick Dorismond, New York City, New York
Khiel Coppin, New York City, New York
Amadou Diallo, New York City, New York
Timothy Stansbury, New York City, New York
Jashon Bryant, Hartford, Connecticut
Sean Bell, New York City, New York
Shem Walker, New York City, New York
Brenda Williams, Scranton, Pennsylvania
Leonard Howze, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Malcolm Brummell, Harrisburg, Pennsylvannia
WEST
Tyisha Miller, Riverside, California
Oscar Grant, Oakland, california
Gary King, Oakland, California
Jody Woodfox, Oakland, California
Andrew Moppin, Oakland, California
Darrick Collins, Athens, California
Woodrow Player, Athens, California
Michael Byoune, Inglewood, California
Eddie Felix Franco, Inglewood, California
Jule Dexter III, Inglewood, California
Richard Ray Tyson, Inglewood, California
Ruben Ortega, Inglewood, California
Orlando Barlow, Las Vegas, Nevada
09/20/09 The Department of Justice, including the FBI, has begun an investigation to see whether any Florida Broward county officers who have fired their weapons have violated any suspects' civil rights. Federal officials would not say how long they think it could take to finish their reviews.
9/11/09 FBI agents collecting data from City Hall computers as part of investigation
9/10/09 Investigation into Memorial deaths during Katrina to be reopened by Orleans Parish district attorney03/01/09 The FBI and Department of Justice are investigating the Inglewood, California police department for several unarmed shootings of minorities.
I re-posted this story because I previously missed the fact the Minneapolis police department gave this maniac a medal of valor for killing Fong Lee. MNPD recently fired him. That's delightful and I hope that woman he likes to beat up on leaves his ass too. Chief Tim Dolan you can wipe that mud off your face anytime.
Wife beating ex-police officer Jason Anderson

Jason Andersen, the police officer who shot and killed Fong Lee was recently fired by the Minneapolis Police Department. The development comes after the fourth-year officer was arrested following a domestic disturbance in June. A criminal charge against Anderson was dismissed two weeks ago, but apparently the incident prompted an internal affairs investigation that led to his dismissal.
In May a federal jury ruled that Anderson did not use excessive force when he shot the 19-year-old North Minneapolis resident eight times following a foot chase in July 2006. Lee’s family had maintained in the civil lawsuit that he was unarmed and gunned down for no justifiable reason.
"If they do result in indictments, I think there will be an international media feeding frenzy"

Eric Holder and his Justice Department have a full plate in trying to clean up the mess in New Orleans. There were 11 unarmed black males shot in New Orleans post Katrina. This blog continues to call for a rigorous Justice Department investigation into the unarmed shootings of minorities across the country by police departments. An investigation by the Justice Department is already proceeding against the Inglewood California police department for the killings of 4 victims of which 3 were unarmed. That investigation is still pending.
A state grand jury in late 2006 indicted seven police officers on murder and attempted murder charges, but a Criminal District Court judge last year dismissed the charges, concluding that prosecutor errors tainted the case. Federal authorities then agreed to pick up the case.
Police officer Pat Gonzales has a reputation as mean as Denzel Washington's character Alonzo Harris in the movie "Training Day", Gonzales is also know as a "dirty vato" on the streets of Oakland. A 10-year veteran, Gonzales has been involved in the deaths of two African-American males and the serious wounding of another.
He was also involved in the SWAT Team assault on an apartment where Lovelle Mixon opened fire with an AK-47 assault rifle killing Sgt. Ervin Romans, 43, and Sgt. Daniel Sakai, 35. Sgt. Gonzales was wounded in the gun battle. Some newspaper reports indicate there was a very good chance Gonzales killed Mixon, making it his third kill as an Oakland police Officer.
In March 2002 Gonzales shot his first victim 19 year-old Joshua Russell, 19, of Hayward after he and an accomplice tried to rob a man at gunpoint in the parking lot of a Burger King restaurant.
Then in 2006 Gonzales shot and paralyzed 17-year-old Ameir Rollins. Mr. Rollins was shot after he cooperated with Gonzales and threw down his weapon, and "look at the result," said Rollins' attorney, David Kelvin.
The city of Oakland settled with Mr.Rollins for 100,000. But before Mr Rollins received his compensation officer Gonzales had shot and killed 19 year-old Gary King in 2007.
King was shot twice in the back after he broke away from Gonzales during a struggle that Gonzales said King reach for the weapon.
One witness, Ailene Romero, said she never saw a gun, and Gonzales shot King as he was running away."There were a lot of young people there, and people just started screaming," Romero said.
Police said Gonzales had been trying to speak with King because King matched the description of a man suspected in the Aug. 21 shooting death of Ronald Spears, 29, of Pittsburg.
Lt. Ersie Joyner III said Gonzales made what is considered "an investigative stop" on King after he saw King exit a nearby store. King "was cooperative at first," Joyner said, and it was a "low-key situation." The situation escalated, however, and a struggle ensued.
Gonzales was said to have tried to use his taser twice on King, but the taser malfunctioned and had no effect.
Joyner said King refused repeated commands by Gonzales to surrender.
Gonzales told investigators he fired twice at King when he continued to try and pull the gun out while turning to get away from him.
King was taken to Highland Hospital where he later died.
"He laid there and died right in front of us," said Shamar Bell, who said he witnessed the shooting and said he had known King since grade school. He said he did not see the officer pat King down before detaining him.
"(Gonzales) put handcuffs on him while he was on his stomach (in the street) in front of us," Bell said. "If he so feared for his life, why didn't he call for backup?"
At one point during the struggle, witnesses said, Gonzales held King by his braids as he tried to break free and escape.
Anela Hobbs said she saw Gonzales use his taser several times on King and saw King reach deep into his low-slung pants. Gonzales then let go of his braids, she said. King had turned to run away when the officer shot twice at him.
"I don't know protocol. I don't know policy. I just know life," Hobbs said. "It was a lose-lose situation all around."
Romero said seeing King handcuffed after being shot was distressing. She questioned why the police would not aim for King's leg instead of shooting him fatally.
Both practices are Oakland police policy in such cases.
"He was a good kid and was straightening out his life," said one of King's friends, who was with King when the incident began and saw the shooting.
Semir Jehar, who was working at a shoe and clothing store that day on Martin Luther King Jr. Way, ran outside when he heard the commotion.
When outside, Jehar said he saw King cooperating, but when Gonzales tried to subdue King, he resisted and tried to get out of Gonzales's hold.
"I thought the police officer maybe shot him with rubber bullets," Jehar said. "The police officer shouldn't have resorted to his gun."
Larry Rollins best summed up the communities feelings about Gonzales when he said, "He beat my son, and he murdered my son. This man is a cancer in our community. He is a disease in the body, and he must be removed."
Gonzales, promoted to Sargent for his kills,today remains the deadliest cop on the streets of Oakland.
[quotes taken from San Francisco Chronicle]

Investigators from the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division visited Orleans Parish prison three times last year, and the resulting report found that conditions there "violate the constitutional rights of inmates.’’
The report cited the case of a guard who beat up an inmate. The prisoner had exposed himself to the guard’s girlfriend, who also worked as a prison guard. The report noted that the guard was suspended for 14 days. Sheriff Gusman points out that the guard was actually fired and criminally prosecuted. But the report’s point is still borne out — prisoners are getting beaten up by guards.And in another case mentioned in the report, a guard who initiated a fight with an inmate was only suspended, not fired.

A DRUNK police officer who mowed down a woman has been arrested - but his passengers who fled the scene may escape charges.
New York police officer Andrew Kelly has been charged over the death of 33-year-old Vionique Valnord after allegedly hitting her with his Jeep, the New York Post reports.
A second off-duty cop, who was in the front passenger seat at the time of yesterday's accident, fled the scene while the pastor's daughter, who had just been at a wedding, lay dying in the Brooklyn street.
By Paul T. Rosynsky Oakland Tribune Updated: 09/25/2009 07:12:01 PM PDT

OAKLAND — A hearing to determine if the murder trial against former BART police officer Johannes Mehserle should be moved to a different county was postponed by four days Friday because an expert witness in the case is ill.
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Morris Jacobson granted the four-day delay because an expert used by Mehserle's defense attorney to argue for a change of venue must be replaced.
Edward Bronson, a Chico State professor with more than a decade of experience in examining juries and change-of-venue issues, recently suffered a "catastrophic illness" that required life-threatening surgery and was unable to testify in the previously scheduled Oct. 2 hearing regarding a change of venue.
Henry K. Lee, SF Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, September 25, 2009
The city of Oakland has agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by an unarmed burglary suspect who was left a paraplegic after a police officer shot him in the back.
Charles Davis Jr., 46, was shot once in the back Jan. 15, 2007, by Officer Hector Chavez inside the Koinonia Apostolic Church at 9429 MacArthur Blvd.
The incident began about 4:30 a.m. when police arrived at the church to investigate a burglar alarm. Chavez encountered Davis inside the church and shot him, believing he was armed, authorities said.
But Davis did not have a gun, and the shot left him a paraplegic, said the suit filed by attorney Richard Simons of Hayward.
"It's wrong to shoot an unarmed man, offering no resistance, in the back," Simons said Friday. "We all hope, on both sides of this case, that both Chavez and Davis will move forward with their lives in a much more positive manner."
In court filings, the city denied wrongdoing. The City Council discussed the settlement in closed session in June and is expected to ratify it in October.
In a memo to the council this month, Assistant City Attorney Randolph Hall urged that the deal be approved "as a compromise of this matter and to avoid a potentially adverse jury verdict."
HIp Hop Wired
September 24, 2009
by JORDAN C. ALSTON

An independent investigation launched in the aftermath of Oscar Grant's murder by the hands of seemingly a solitary transit authority officer has shed light on several new details surrounding the incident.
At the cost of $250,000, a private investigation firm looking into the shooting has uncovered the dealings of transit officers whose misdeeds contributed to Grant's death.
Tony Pirone and Marysol Domenici are facing termination for their role in the fatal shooting that transpired on New Year's Day, with the independent report recommending that both officer be fired.
Both officers are currently on paid leave and have been since the incident.
Pirone was the officer that was seen either punching or “elbowing” Grant while he was on the ground. Soon after the unarmed Black man was viciously murdered in cold blood as Officer Johannes Mehserle fired into him as he laid on the ground.
In the face of the blatantly racist attack, BART Police Chief Gary Gee is sticking by his subordinates.
“I will say that all the officer who responded to the incident at around 2 a.m. at Fruitvale station followed protocol,” said Oakland Transit Authority's top cop. “I thought that they performed their duties in a professional manner.”
By D. Large
September 25, 2009

This is another one of those stories typifying the disparities that exist in sentencing between blacks and whites. I mean it's no secret that Blacks and Hispanics have always been treated more harshly in the courts than whites. And they typically receive longer sentences than whites.
But sometimes you really have to question the sentences meted out to blacks.
The 2 stories below illustrate both elements of the harshness judges can exact on black defendants versus the leniency whites can receive before the court.
In Philadelphia Tonya Stephens, who is black, was sentenced Thursday to four to eight years for hindering the apprehension of a fugitive and for criminal conspiracy. She helped Eric Floyd hide after he and two other men robbed a bank and fatally shot Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski in May 2008. Tonya was no saint. She was already on probation for some previous offenses.
Why she helped Mr. Floyd is unknown. Maybe she was in love, or may Mr. Floyd coerced her, or maybe she was just greedy and couldn't pass up a shopping spree at Walmart. Whatever her reasons she will now have to to do 6 to 13 years in prison. That is a steep sentence considering she was not an actual participant in the robbery. And she wasn't present when Eric and his friends killed the police officer.
Several weeks ago I posted a story about a white New Jersey man, Peter Bielecke, who likes to rob banks (I do mean plural here). His little niche was that he liked to rob banks every Thursday. He didn’t give a reason for choosing Thursdays. But authorities say that the pattern made it easier to track him.
Mr. Bielecke pleaded guilty in June to one count of bank robbery but admitted to five other holdups on consecutive Thursdays in January, February, and March. He robbed banks in several cities, including Brick, his hometown.
Mr. Bielecke must have stood before the judge with a rabbit's foot in his pocket because he’ll only serve five years and 10 months in prison. He’ll also have to pay nearly $12,000 in restitution under the sentence handed down Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Trenton.
I'm wholly ignorant of the sentencing guidelines that were used in both of these cases to arrive at Ms. Stephens' and Mr. Bielecke's respective sentences. But on the surface it appears that there were some mitigating factors used to influence the court's decision to give Mr. Bielecke five years and 10 months of prison time for admittedly robbing six banks.
I don't know whether Mr. Bielecke brought the judge an apple everyday to court or at worst slipped a ROTH contribution into the judge's retirement fund. But the sentences do appear oddly strange when you realize that you can get more time for a criminal conspiracy than for robbing six of your local banks.
I like to watch the program "The Investigators" on A&E. I notice that every suspect the police bring in who freely admits by confession to a crime, that individual gets charged for the crime. This is what puzzles me in Mr. Bielecke's case. He admitted to robbing five other banks and yet the sentence he was given looks more like the penalty for some dead-beat father who is in arrears for six years of child support.
Mr. Bielecke sentence was a gift from the court considering the seriousness of his crime. If he was armed in the commission of those bank robberies he placed more individuals in harms way than Ms Stephens who only crime was hiding her boyfriend from police.
These two cases provide a good example that sometimes it's not what you do, but it has everything to do with what color you are and what you are doing.
Posted by Francis L. Holland Blog Thursday, September 24, 2009

I don't think most people with white skin on juries are making police brutality/atrocity decisions based on the evidence presented at trial. White people believe that the police are there to protect them (white people), so white people ignore the facts and make public poliicy decisions to support police regardless of the evidence presented at trial.
This is why it is so important for prosecutors to select an all-white jury, such as the one that tried Esteban Carpio (even though Providence, Rhode Island is over 50% Black and Latino). By getting an all-white jury AND favorable evidentiary decisions from the judge, prosecutors are more like (practically guaranteed) to get a conviction, regardless of the atrocities that police are shown to have committed during the arrest and questioning.div>
Of course many or most white people will disagree with what I've said here, but they'll also agree that if police beat or electrically shocked an arrestee, then the arrestee "probably got what he deserved". And white juries are unwilling to convict or punish police for their behavior when they believe that the defendant/victim "probably got what he deserved."
What this means is that many or most white people are willing to accept and support summary justice and pre-trial extrajudicial punishment of prisoners as well as a type of informal double jeopardy, in which arrestees for punished once by police at the time of arrest then a second time by the judge after a conviction.
When "justice" works this way, I'm not sure what distinguishes the United States from many other countries. I personally believe that the right to be tried by a jury or judge before punishment is meted out is a more fundamental and important right than the right to bear firearms. Most white people would strongly disagree with me, at least when it is most important -- when making a decision as a member of a jury, but also when delineating the role of police officers in society.
Most white people would insist that there is a significant difference between the police and the Klu Klux Klan, because police are part of the formal, legal criminal justice system. But when police regularly act summarily, as an angry lawless white-hooded mob would, and with impunity, then the difference between the police and klansmen is one of degree, but not one of substance.
Mr.Obama Shemika Walker went to her father’s grave yesterday to say goodbye before her Oct. 15 leave date for a second tour in Iraq. Her father was a casualty in the war police have waged against unarmed minorities in this country. Let's hope Shemika's blood won't be spilled fighting your war.
by Alison Bowen

Shem Walker’s daughters, Shavone (center) and Shemika (right), sit beside Noel Leader from 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care at last night’s forum. Although the event was advertised as a remembering, the focus was on moving forward.
About 50 people gathered last night to remember Shem Walker, filling the hall at Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church. Mr. Walker was killed by an undercover narcotics cop on his stoop on Lafayette Avenue on July 10. He was unarmed and apparently got into a confrontation with the officer after trying to evict him from his stoop.
The forum, which brought together Mr. Walker’s family, activists and local elected officials, quickly turned into a discussion about how to end what participants described as a pattern of racial profiling and police brutality in the neighborhood.
City Councilwoman Letitia James urged unity.
“We have to come together collectively as a community that cares,” she said.
Maisha Morales, a board member of Families United for Racial and Economic Equality (FUREE), which sponsored the event with Fort Greene Peace and Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries, said she sees racial profiling every day — groups of young men stopped by police, men being pulled over and told to stand against a wall.
“I’ve been observing this for quite some time now,” she said.
Mr. Walker’s mother and two daughters were also present.
“We’re just lost,” Shemika Walker, wearing her Army fatigues, told The Local. She listed the things they have asked for but not received from the police department: her father’s personal things, an update on the investigation, the shooting officer’s name.
“Nope, no name, no nothing,” she said.
Shemika went to her father’s grave yesterday to say goodbye before her Oct. 15 leave date for a second tour in Iraq. Seeing the turnout at the forum after that was comforting, she said.
“It’s not even faces we know, and that’s very touching for our family,” she said.
Fort Greene Peace first wanted to inform the neighborhood about Walker’s death, said founder Ed Goldman.
“People don’t know,” he said. “People do care.”
Now, he said, he hopes to launch a discussion and eventually change some of the problems put forth at the forum.
Blame bounced around the room — at the police, at the district attorney, at elected officials.
But many brought suggestions.
Mr. Jeffries wants to push legislation that won’t allow officers to waive their right to a jury, which can result in a trial solely before a judge. “Judges are reluctant to convict officers,” Mr. Jeffries said.
Noel Leader, from 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care, said an independent prosecutor should be appointed for a fair investigation. “We have no confidence whatsoever in the district attorney’s office,” he said.
Kirsten John Foy, the Walker family spokesman and criminal justice coordinator of the Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, urged witnesses to come forward. Right now, he said, “there’s not even enough evidence to indict the officer.”
The Kings Count District Attorney’s office says only that the investigation is ongoing and will not release any additional details.
Fort Greene resident Joseph Gordon came to the forum after reading a flier.
He tenses up when he sees a police car behind him, he said. “It won’t be a surprise to be stopped, even if I haven’t committed any traffic offenses.”
His next step? He said he will attend an Oct. 1 meeting of FUREE.
“It’s a good start,” he said. “It’s a process. A lot of hurdles to get over.”
September 23, 2009
Independent Assessment Monitoring, LLP
The controversial death of Mark Barmore by Rockford, Illinois police has resulted in the city requesting the services of an outside consulting firm called Independent Assessment and Monitoring, LLP,(IMT). This is the same company that the city of Oakland selected in July 2003 to conduct a comprehensive review of the city's police department.Rockford city officials made a good selection in acquiring the services of IMT. The company was formed by Washington D.C civil rights law firm Relman & Dane (formerly Relman & Associates) which specializes in fair housing, fair lending and police accountability.Their cases include some of the country's most significant discrimination suits, such as Denny's Restaurants, Avis Rent-A-Car, Adam's Mark Hotels, U.S. Secret Service and Capital City Mortgage Corp.
The failure of the Oakland police department to continue implementing the changes recommended by the IMT is reflected in the city still having one of the highest numbers of police shootings in the United States with a number of other police brutality lawsuits pending.
.jpg)
On October 2nd there will be an important hearing which will decide whether the murder trial of Johannes Mehserle—the BART cop who shot 22 year old Oscar Grant in the back as he lay prone on an train platform in Oakland—takes place in Alameda County, the county where the murder occurred, or is moved to some other county in California.
In the recent past, attorneys for police on trial for acts of brutality have succeeded in getting acquittals by changing the venue. This is true even in the most extreme and damning cases where the guilt and conviction of police seemed almost certain. The police who killed Amadou Diallo in the Bronx in 1999 when he reached for his wallet were acquitted by an upstate Albany, New York jury. The Los Angeles police who were videotaped beating Rodney King were acquitted in their first trial, in 1992, when that trial was moved to suburban Simi Valley.
It was only a matter of time before ignorant Nazi white racist would crawl out from under their slimy rocks and do some dumb stupid shit. But I hope they continue to fuel the flames of bigotry until it puts Rockford, Illinois on the national scene. Then maybe CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and every other major media outlet in this country will start drawing attention to the national problem of police killing unarmed minorities in this country.
ROCKFORD — Mary Ann Barmore, the guardian of a man who was shot and killed by police last month after he fled from them and tried to hide inside a church day care, woke up Sunday morning to a swastika, vulgar language and a broken side-view mirror on her van.

TRENTON, N.J. - A judge has ended federal monitoring of the New Jersey State Police more than 10 years after the shooting of unarmed minority men during a highway traffic stop prompted intervention over racial profiling.
U.S. District Court Judge Mary L. Cooper signed the order dissolving a consent decree Monday, following a joint motion filed in August by the state and U.S. Justice Department.
The move followed Gov. Jon Corzine's bill signing in August that established an office within the state attorney general's office to oversee the state police.
"The court-ordered lifting of the federal consent decree represents a watershed moment for all of the more than 4,000 members of the New Jersey State Police who have worked tirelessly to gain and maintain the public's trust and confidence through transparency, sound managerial oversight and holding fast to the best practices of police professionalism and reform," State Police Superintendent Colonel Rick Fuentes said after Cooper had signed the order.
State police agreed to federal oversight after troopers on the New Jersey Tur